2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing equations to predict waist circumference measurements based on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute method from the World Health Organization method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Waist circumference was measured horizontally at the thickest part, near the navel, using a tape measure. If an error ≥ 0.5 cm occurred after two measurements, the measurement was repeated and the highest value was used [27]. A nurse collected blood samples from the median cubital vein.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Metabolic Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waist circumference was measured horizontally at the thickest part, near the navel, using a tape measure. If an error ≥ 0.5 cm occurred after two measurements, the measurement was repeated and the highest value was used [27]. A nurse collected blood samples from the median cubital vein.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Metabolic Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement considered the midpoint between the last rib and the iliac crest [ 1 ]. The normal WC value of men was considered as ≤94 cm and as ≤80 cm for women [ 29 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although WC measurement was consistent within each HES, comparisons between the US and the other countries should be additionally treated with caution as the former measured WC at the top of the iliac crest rather than at the mid-point between the iliac crest and the costal wall. There is some evidence to suggest WC measurements at the top of the iliac crest versus the mid-point are larger, especially in women (33)(34). Peruvian data could only be presented from 2018 to 2020, hence these findings on secular changes should be treated with caution.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%