2021
DOI: 10.3171/2020.2.jns192051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of ventriculostomy infection in a large single-center cohort

Abstract: OBJECTIVEExternal ventricular drain (EVD) placement is a common neurosurgical procedure. While this procedure is simple and effective, infection is a major limiting factor. Factors predictive of infection reported in the literature are not conclusive. The aim of this retrospective, single-center large series was to assess the rate and independent predictors of ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI).METHODS Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the numbers of CSF collections before VAI was identi ed between the VAI group and the non-VAI group were not statistically different (3.0 vs. 3.5, P = 0.337), consistent with a recent study by Sweid et al who demonstrated that routine CSF collection and CSF collection when needed were not associated with VAI. [11] Our study suggests that CSF collection itself may not be a signi cant risk factor for VAI, provided that the closed CSF drainage system is not breached.…”
Section: Patient and Procedures Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In the current study, the numbers of CSF collections before VAI was identi ed between the VAI group and the non-VAI group were not statistically different (3.0 vs. 3.5, P = 0.337), consistent with a recent study by Sweid et al who demonstrated that routine CSF collection and CSF collection when needed were not associated with VAI. [11] Our study suggests that CSF collection itself may not be a signi cant risk factor for VAI, provided that the closed CSF drainage system is not breached.…”
Section: Patient and Procedures Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This figure is significantly higher than figures quoted in literature from centers in first-world countries that utilized standard EVD devices. These ranged between 3 and 10% [17][18][19][20][21]. The reason for the high infection rates may be related to the design of the improvised drains themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported rates of EVD associated infections range between 0 and 23.2% (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and lead to prolonged hospitalization of patients at intensive care units (ICU) (6). The number of studies investigating possible risk factors that lead to EVD associated infections are sparse and show divergent results (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Indication for EVD insertion, multiple catheters used, duration of catheterization, CSF sampling frequency, and co-infection are usually described as the most common risk factors leading to EVD associated infections (5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indication for EVD insertion, multiple catheters used, duration of catheterization, CSF sampling frequency, and co-infection are usually described as the most common risk factors leading to EVD associated infections (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). However, comparison between studies is often complicated due to different definitions of EVD associated infections (2, 3,[10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation