2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

321: Comparison of asymmetric versus symmetric IUGR – results from a national prospective trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Dashe et al found that 80% were symmetrical IUGR (33) . In contrast, O'Connor et al found that only 29% of the patients' group were symmetrical IUGR while 71% were asymmetrical IUGR (34) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, Dashe et al found that 80% were symmetrical IUGR (33) . In contrast, O'Connor et al found that only 29% of the patients' group were symmetrical IUGR while 71% were asymmetrical IUGR (34) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%