2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genital Reconstructive Surgery in Male to Female Transgender Patients: A Systematic Review of Primary Surgical Techniques, Complication Profiles, and Functional Outcomes from 1950 to Present Day

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest satisfaction outcomes correspond to sexual intercourse, their partner's satisfaction, and the neovaginal depth, having obtained an average depth of 13.7 cm. This result contrasts with the minimum of 11 cm depth described as optimal by the literature (20). In this way, it becomes crucial to clarify patients' expectations and possibilities of achieving them before surgery to obtain satisfactory results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest satisfaction outcomes correspond to sexual intercourse, their partner's satisfaction, and the neovaginal depth, having obtained an average depth of 13.7 cm. This result contrasts with the minimum of 11 cm depth described as optimal by the literature (20). In this way, it becomes crucial to clarify patients' expectations and possibilities of achieving them before surgery to obtain satisfactory results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This score is consistent with the percentage of regret described in the literature. A recent systematic review (20) shows less than 1% of total regret and 5.5% of some regret.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Obese patients appear to be at higher risk of perioperative complications across various surgical fields, but there is conflicting evidence on which adverse outcomes are directly related to obesity itself and which are more attributable to the medical comorbidities associated with obesity 9,15,21 . Nevertheless, many genital reconstructive urologists use elevated BMI as exclusion criteria for GRS candidates 6,7 . Epidemiologic studies have identified transgender patients have higher rates of obesity than the cisgender population 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial feminization maneuvers, bottom surgeries, and other gender-affirming surgery have been described previously. 12 13 14 15 16 17 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%