2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(02)90034-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

32. Evaluation of a rapid chromatographic strip test for the pen-side detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus antigen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the strength of the reaction for individual isolates were due to differences in the affinities of the antibodies used in the two assays (polyclonal antibody versus. mAbs; Ferris et al, 2010 The World Reference Laboratory for Foot-and-Mouth Disease (WRLFMD) reported that 70%-80% of the positive specimens were diagnosed using DAS ELISAs from tissue suspensions of clinical material, the remaining 20%-30% of field samples were diagnosed positive after virus amplification in cell culture (Reid, Bruening, Ferris, Hutchings, & Akerblom, 2000). Virus amplification may require several days for completion and delay the implementation of correct control procedures.…”
Section: Serological Comparisons Of Fmdv Sat 2 Viruses From Kenyamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the strength of the reaction for individual isolates were due to differences in the affinities of the antibodies used in the two assays (polyclonal antibody versus. mAbs; Ferris et al, 2010 The World Reference Laboratory for Foot-and-Mouth Disease (WRLFMD) reported that 70%-80% of the positive specimens were diagnosed using DAS ELISAs from tissue suspensions of clinical material, the remaining 20%-30% of field samples were diagnosed positive after virus amplification in cell culture (Reid, Bruening, Ferris, Hutchings, & Akerblom, 2000). Virus amplification may require several days for completion and delay the implementation of correct control procedures.…”
Section: Serological Comparisons Of Fmdv Sat 2 Viruses From Kenyamentioning
confidence: 99%