ICC 91 International Conference on Communications Conference Record
DOI: 10.1109/icc.1991.162454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

32*32 shared buffer type ATM switch VLSIs for B-ISDN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once at the correct output, packets are simply sent, in turn, at every time slot. Shared output buffers [4], although they have no effect on the mean performance, reduce the buffer size needed to absorb queue-size variations and are used in this paper.…”
Section: A Input Versus Output Switch Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once at the correct output, packets are simply sent, in turn, at every time slot. Shared output buffers [4], although they have no effect on the mean performance, reduce the buffer size needed to absorb queue-size variations and are used in this paper.…”
Section: A Input Versus Output Switch Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For signaling, at every time slot, a queue sends an -bit message to the PA with the queue state, and the PA sends back a log -bit message with the selected packet subqueue [2]. This indicates the input-buffered switch has a compact and fast implementation compared to the more complex output-buffered switch [4].…”
Section: B Software (Sw) and Neural Network (Nn) Packet Arbitratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATLAS maintains multiple logical output queues as a shared pool of identifiers with a single shared controller, avoiding the high area cost of dedicated buffers and controllers per output queue, as in the Prizma switch [6]. In addition, the operation of the single controller in ATLAS I is pipelined, since it has to manage the cell data structures at much higher rates than previous switches [20] [11]. The ATLAS switch implements multilane credit-based flow control (section 2), while other switches either provide no flow control at all [6] [11] [20], or only single-lane flow control [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now almost unanimously agreed that ATM will become an enabling technology for the future integrated digital networks and thus nearly all large computer and communication companies have invested in developing ATM products [2,3,4,5]. However, most existing ATM products have been developed without attention to a fundamental problem of the ATM: trac control to maintain a satisfactory network performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, lossless synchronous transmission is guaranteed. 3 Dynamic bandwidth sharing and lossless transmission Algorithm 2.1 would behave very much like STM or Stop-and-Go if no asynchronous transmission were allowed in Step 3. Each connection is allocated a certain amount of bandwidth, but any unused or unallocated bandwidth is wasted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%