2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

31P NMR parameters may facilitate the stereochemical analysis of phosphorus-containing compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, we applied the docking approach to mildly ( 2 , n Conf 20 = 2) and highly flexible compounds ( 3 , n Conf 20 = 8) that have been studied in our previous work. 21 Both 2 and 3 were characterized in our previous study 21 by means of NMR spectroscopy. Therein, also the absolute configuration of 2- SR and 2- RR was determined by X-ray diffraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, we applied the docking approach to mildly ( 2 , n Conf 20 = 2) and highly flexible compounds ( 3 , n Conf 20 = 8) that have been studied in our previous work. 21 Both 2 and 3 were characterized in our previous study 21 by means of NMR spectroscopy. Therein, also the absolute configuration of 2- SR and 2- RR was determined by X-ray diffraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next chose our own set of phosphorus compounds ( Figure 5 , 11 – 29 ; for simplicity compounds 30 – 34[O] discussed later are included in the MAD/RMSD values here). This was done to to determine if the calculation and scaling would be accurate enough to distinguish stereoisomers via chemical shifts rather than coupling constants [ 72 73 ] and provide confirmation of unusual structures and chemical shifts, and with the further stipulation that multiple P–C bonding would likely give inaccurate M06-2X NMR calculations ( Table 3 ; results with the IGLO-III basis set are included in Supporting Information File 1 , Tables S6–S9, and as expected gave higher MAD/RMSD values). The M06-2X (optimization) and B3LYP (NMR) functional combination gave the best MAD/RMSD, and the relatively low RMSD is consistent with the fact that there were no glaring discrepancies in experimental and calculated chemical shifts, both for the initial group of 1a – 10 ( Table 2 ) and the new group of 11 – 34[O] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…later are included in the MAD/RMSD values here). This was done to to determine if the calculation and scaling would be accurate enough to distinguish stereoisomers via chemical shifts rather than coupling constants[72,73] and provide confirmation of unusual structures and chemical shifts, and with the further stipulation that multiple P-C bonding would likely give inaccurate M06-2X NMR calculations (Table3; results with the IGLO-III basis set are included in…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, kombinací s kvantově-chemickými výpočty 25,26 lze určit relativní konfiguraci na základě J C-P (cit. 27 ).…”
Section: Stereochemická Analýza Využívající 31 P Nmr Parametryunclassified
“…Obr. 8 ukazuje korelace mezi experimentálními a vypočtenými RDC, které určují relativní konfiguraci RR izomeru 27 .…”
Section: Stereochemická Analýza Využívající 31 P Nmr Parametryunclassified