2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06203-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal genetic association and temporal genetic causality methods for dissecting complex networks

Abstract: A large amount of panomic data has been generated in populations for understanding causal relationships in complex biological systems. Both genetic and temporal models can be used to establish causal relationships among molecular, cellular, or phenotypical traits, but with limitations. To fully utilize high-dimension temporal and genetic data, we develop a multivariate polynomial temporal genetic association (MPTGA) approach for detecting temporal genetic loci (teQTLs) of quantitative traits monitored over tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(108 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lin et al [6] proposed a Multivariate Polynomial Time-dependent Genetic Association (MPTGA) method to detect genetic effects in temporal gene expression trajectories. The MPTGA method assumes that for each genotype j , the temporal gene expression trait y across m time points follows a multivariate normal distribution , with density function …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lin et al [6] proposed a Multivariate Polynomial Time-dependent Genetic Association (MPTGA) method to detect genetic effects in temporal gene expression trajectories. The MPTGA method assumes that for each genotype j , the temporal gene expression trait y across m time points follows a multivariate normal distribution , with density function …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the joint likelihood The maximum likelihood estimates of the parameter set can be derived as described in the Lin et al [6] paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 692 SNPs was determined based on the GAMMAR p-value< 5 × 10 −5 (Figure 2). We next divided the whole yeast genome into 603 20-kb bins, and then SNPs with the smallest GAMMAR p-values were selected in each bin for comparison with the previous yeast eQTL studies [21,22]. We determined that 117 trans-eQTLs had 59 eGenes on three chromosomes.…”
Section: Gammar Analysis Using the Yeast Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collectively, we defined the six bins as trans-regulatory hotspots and 59 eGenes as putative regulators. Of the 59 total eGenes, nine had been previously identified [21,22,24] (Table 1). In four previous studies, MATing type protein ALPHA 1; III:190000 (MATALPHA1) was reported to be a casual regulator [21,[25][26][27], and Killer toxin REsistant 33; XIV:360000 (KRE33) was recently identified as a putative causal regulator [24].…”
Section: Gammar Analysis Using the Yeast Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%