2018
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aar8568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new fossil assemblage shows that large angiosperm trees grew in North America by the Turonian (Late Cretaceous)

Abstract: Fossils from Utah show large flowering trees evolved at least 15 million years earlier than previously thought.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, gymnosperms appeared well before angiosperms in the Devonian (∼380 Ma) and flourished in diversity during the Mesozoic ( 14 , 32 34 ). The fossil record shows a sudden and rapid increase in diversity and geographic spread of angiosperms since the middle Cretaceous ( 18 , 19 , 35 40 ), which resulted in the ecological dominance, in terms of species richness, of flowering plants observed in most terrestrial ecosystems today ( 41 46 ). As a consequence, it is widely assumed that angiosperms underwent such an ecological and evolutionary diversification that they outcompeted and outnumbered other land plants in terms of richness ( 18 , 19 , 35 46 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, gymnosperms appeared well before angiosperms in the Devonian (∼380 Ma) and flourished in diversity during the Mesozoic ( 14 , 32 34 ). The fossil record shows a sudden and rapid increase in diversity and geographic spread of angiosperms since the middle Cretaceous ( 18 , 19 , 35 40 ), which resulted in the ecological dominance, in terms of species richness, of flowering plants observed in most terrestrial ecosystems today ( 41 46 ). As a consequence, it is widely assumed that angiosperms underwent such an ecological and evolutionary diversification that they outcompeted and outnumbered other land plants in terms of richness ( 18 , 19 , 35 46 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fossil record shows a sudden and rapid increase in diversity and geographic spread of angiosperms since the middle Cretaceous ( 18 , 19 , 35 40 ), which resulted in the ecological dominance, in terms of species richness, of flowering plants observed in most terrestrial ecosystems today ( 41 46 ). As a consequence, it is widely assumed that angiosperms underwent such an ecological and evolutionary diversification that they outcompeted and outnumbered other land plants in terms of richness ( 18 , 19 , 35 46 ). Despite decades of scientific debate on the pattern of biotic replacements ( 16 24 , 35 39 ), the main underlying processes of speciation and extinction of gymnosperms have not been formally quantified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many are comparable in size and complexity to newly discovered leaves from the Turonian Mancos Shale Formation which have been attributed to trees (Jud et al . ). This would make the Redmond flora slightly older, assuming the relative dating of the formation is accurate (see Geological Setting, above).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this regard, the discovery and scoring of new palaeofloras (Jud et al . ) remains an essential aspect of palaeoclimatology based on biological proxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current evidence indicates that the earliest caenagnathids, including giant forms, had dispersed to North America by the Albian-Cenomanian (Makovicky and Sues 1998;Simon et al 2019). During this interval, terrestrial ecosystems in North America were undergoing drastic reorganizations, including turnovers in both the flora and fauna (Cifelli et al 1997;Sues and Averianov 2009;Makovicky 2011, 2013;Prieto-Marquez et al 2016;Jud et al 2018;Nesbitt et al 2019;Zanno et al 2019). The presence of caenagnathids in North America during this interval may have enabled them to occupy opening niches and expand in body size range.…”
Section: Caenagnathid Phylogeny and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%