2018
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European multicentre study validates enhanced liver fibrosis test as biomarker of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis

Abstract: Between the first and this validation studies, the value of the ELF score as independent marker of skin and lung involvement in SSc is confirmed in 457 patients. A longitudinal study is on-going to identify an SSc specific algorithm with predictive value for skin and lung progression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that serum markers that have been validated as cross sectional markers of skin fibrosis [8] have remarkably different trajectories of change between ANA subgroups, specifically the two dominant ANA reactivities, ATA and ARA.. Given our findings, despite the well-established correlation of the ELF test with MRSS and FVC [12], interpretation on a group level in early dcSSc with a mixed ANA profile, and especially over time, may be misleading. Unlike previous work on circulating markers of collagen turnover [13,14], we did not identify clear differences between markers of collagen degradation (C1M, C4M, C6M) between disease subgroups [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…We show that serum markers that have been validated as cross sectional markers of skin fibrosis [8] have remarkably different trajectories of change between ANA subgroups, specifically the two dominant ANA reactivities, ATA and ARA.. Given our findings, despite the well-established correlation of the ELF test with MRSS and FVC [12], interpretation on a group level in early dcSSc with a mixed ANA profile, and especially over time, may be misleading. Unlike previous work on circulating markers of collagen turnover [13,14], we did not identify clear differences between markers of collagen degradation (C1M, C4M, C6M) between disease subgroups [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The ELF panel has been used as a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis allowing a minimally invasive blood sampling method to be used instead of obtaining a liver biopsy (Tanwar et al, 2017). ELF score and PIIINP levels were also shown to be correlated with skin and lung fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis (Abignano et al, 2019).…”
Section: Other Diseases-mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…While some studies suggest that TE can overestimate fibrosis in the presence of steatosis, 12–14 ELF performs well in the presence of steatohepatitis 15,16 . The impact of extrahepatic fibrosis has yet to be fully quantified 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%