2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing selection on a recessive lethal deletion with pleiotropic effects on two neighboring genes in the porcine genome

Abstract: Livestock populations can be used to study recessive defects caused by deleterious alleles. The frequency of deleterious alleles including recessive lethal alleles can stay at high or moderate frequency within a population, especially if recessive lethal alleles exhibit an advantage for favourable traits in heterozygotes. In this study, we report such a recessive lethal deletion of 212kb (del) within the BBS9 gene in a breeding population of pigs. The deletion produces a truncated BBS9 protein expected to caus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is likely that the MSTN c.820G>T mutation was maintained at moderate frequency in this line despite its deleterious impact on piglet mortality due to heterozygous advantage for muscle and fat traits. Similar examples of balancing selection have observed to explain the maintenance of deleterious alleles at moderate frequency in commercial cattle [10, 31] and pig [14] populations. The results described herein have major implications for the targeted ablation of MSTN via gene editing to increase lean growth in pigs, and provide a plausible explanation of why MSTN loss-of-function mutations have not previously been reported in pigs despite decades of selection for lean growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is likely that the MSTN c.820G>T mutation was maintained at moderate frequency in this line despite its deleterious impact on piglet mortality due to heterozygous advantage for muscle and fat traits. Similar examples of balancing selection have observed to explain the maintenance of deleterious alleles at moderate frequency in commercial cattle [10, 31] and pig [14] populations. The results described herein have major implications for the targeted ablation of MSTN via gene editing to increase lean growth in pigs, and provide a plausible explanation of why MSTN loss-of-function mutations have not previously been reported in pigs despite decades of selection for lean growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Examples of such balancing selection in cattle include a frame-shift mutation in the mannose receptor C typed 2 (MRC2) gene responsible for crooked tail syndrome and also associated with increased muscle mass in Belgian Blue [11], and a large deletion with antagonistic effects on fertility and milk production traits in Nordic Red [12, 13] is likely to have caused an increase in incidence of porcine stress syndrome (also known as malignant hyperthermia) in the 1970s and 1980s, due to the association of the causative missense mutation with reduced backfat - a trait under selection. More recently, a recessive embryonic lethal deletion in the bone structure and strength QTL 9 (BSS9) gene was associated with heterozygous advantage for growth rate, explaining an unexpectedly high frequency of this allele in a commercial pig line [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work demonstrates that some variants that cause lethality in homozygous state are present at relatively high frequency in commercial pig lines [64,65]. Knowing these recessive lethal mutations can aid in avoiding matings between carriers of such mutations within the breeding scheme.…”
Section: Breeding and Genomics Go Hand In Handmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the number of mummified piglets revealed five haplotypes with a significant increase in mummified piglets per litter (Table 2. 4). The increase ranged from 37.1 to 479.4%, accounting for an increase of 0.16 to 1.64 mummified piglets per litter for C x C matings compared to C x NC matings.…”
Section: Number Of Mummified Pigletsmentioning
confidence: 94%