2018
DOI: 10.1107/s2052252518010552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homology-based loop modeling yields more complete crystallographic protein structures

Abstract: Thousands of regions missing from existing protein structure models are completed using new methods based on homology.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were phased using PHASER using pdb 4OUE as a molecular replacement model and refined using REFMAC [ 37 ] and Coot [ 38 ] within the CCP4 software environment [ 39 ]. The PDB REDO server [ 40 ] was used to optimize the refinement parameters and the model was validated using the Molprobity server [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were phased using PHASER using pdb 4OUE as a molecular replacement model and refined using REFMAC [ 37 ] and Coot [ 38 ] within the CCP4 software environment [ 39 ]. The PDB REDO server [ 40 ] was used to optimize the refinement parameters and the model was validated using the Molprobity server [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogenicity of the p.L381P renin variant was predicted using the following in silico tools: PolyPhen-2 29 , Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) 30 , Site Directed Mutator (SDM) 31 and Mutation Taster 32 . The effect of the L381P mutation was predicted with the standalone version of FoldX 33 using as starting point the re-refined coordinates of PDB entry 4AMT in the PDB-REDO databank 34 . This model was prepared using the RepairPDB command of FoldX and subsequently subjected to 5 BuildModel runs, resulting in an average free energy difference between the wild-type and the mutant of 3.1 Kcal/mol (consistent with a destabilizing mutation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the three models pass these criteria. The Ramachandran plot Z-score (Rama-Z; Hooft et al, 1997;van Beusekom et al, 2018;Sobolev et al, 2020) provides a convenient numerical estimate of the protein main-chain conformation validity. The rule-of-thumb interpretation of the Ramachandran plot Z-score (Sobolev et al, 2020) can be summarized as |Rama-Z| > 3 is poor, indicating improbable backbone geometry, 2 < |Rama-Z| < 3 is unlikely yet possible and |Rama-Z| < 2 is a good, normal backbone.…”
Section: Test-model Selection Preparation Refinement Setup and Analmentioning
confidence: 99%