2018
DOI: 10.1038/s10038-018-0504-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of novel pathogenic variants and novel gene-phenotype correlations in Mexican subjects with microphthalmia and/or anophthalmia by next-generation sequencing

Abstract: Severe congenital eye malformations, particularly microphthalmia and anophthalmia, are one of the main causes of visual handicap worldwide. They can arise from multifactorial, chromosomal, or monogenic factors and can be associated with extensive clinical variability. Genetic analysis of individuals with these defects has allowed the recognition of dozens of genes whose mutations lead to disruption of normal ocular embryonic development. Recent application of next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques for gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This data was analyzed prioritizing 83 known A/M genes and resulted in the identification of causative mutations in 3 individuals (11%). More recently, WES was applied to a cohort of 14 patients with bilateral A/M (Matias-Perez et al 2018). As expected, given the bilaterality and severity of ocular phenotype, the mutation detection rate in this cohort was almost 60% (8/14), the majority carrying alterations in well-known eye genes (7/8).…”
Section: -Diagnostic Strategysupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This data was analyzed prioritizing 83 known A/M genes and resulted in the identification of causative mutations in 3 individuals (11%). More recently, WES was applied to a cohort of 14 patients with bilateral A/M (Matias-Perez et al 2018). As expected, given the bilaterality and severity of ocular phenotype, the mutation detection rate in this cohort was almost 60% (8/14), the majority carrying alterations in well-known eye genes (7/8).…”
Section: -Diagnostic Strategysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Thus, WES studies resulted in a detection rate similar to that obtained by the targeted sequencing of a panel of the main known genes. However, an advantage of WES over panel sequencing is the opportunity to identify new causal genes in particular pedigrees (Chassaing et al 2016b;Matias-Perez et al 2018;Patel et al 2018;Srour et al 2013).…”
Section: -Diagnostic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our yield of pathogenic variants (1/19; 5%) was much lower than two recent studies employing WES in patients with anophthalmia and microphthalmia (60%) 29 and in microphthalmia and posterior microphthalmia (61%) 1 . However, low rates of diagnosis have previously been reported in patients with MAC who underwent exome sequencing (11%) 30 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…19 T A B L E 1 Ocular findings in 19 patients with structural eye defects, together with exome results ginal retina by downregulating the expression of proneural genes. [20][21][22] The gene is an excellent candidate for structural eye defects and the variant had a CADD score of 33, but heterozygosity for this WNT2B Our yield of pathogenic variants (1/19; 5%) was much lower than two recent studies employing WES in patients with anophthalmia and microphthalmia (60%) 29 and in microphthalmia and posterior microphthalmia (61%). 1 However, low rates of diagnosis have previously been reported in patients with MAC who underwent exome sequencing (11%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…2b ). This recently reported 10 p.Gly212Ser variant affects a key glycine (G-X-Y) residue of the COL4A1 protein and is expected to disrupt collagen IV heterotrimer formation with COL4A2, as noted for other missense pathogenic COL4A1 variants associated with ASD (Fig. 3a ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%