2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting interstate motor carrier crash rate level using classification models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once government policies are developed, regulatory bodies must ensure proper and efficient identification of high‐risk drivers and carriers (Hwang, Boyle, and Banerjee 2019; Lantz and Loftus 2005; Liu, Boyle, and Banerjee 2018), and meaningful, consistent enforcement through efforts such as compliance reviews (Chen 2008). Audits can improve the safety standard of the industry, but in order to be effective penalties must be high (when probability of enforcement is small), or the probability of being caught must be high (when the penalty is small; Moses and Savage 1992).…”
Section: Report the Results (Step 6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once government policies are developed, regulatory bodies must ensure proper and efficient identification of high‐risk drivers and carriers (Hwang, Boyle, and Banerjee 2019; Lantz and Loftus 2005; Liu, Boyle, and Banerjee 2018), and meaningful, consistent enforcement through efforts such as compliance reviews (Chen 2008). Audits can improve the safety standard of the industry, but in order to be effective penalties must be high (when probability of enforcement is small), or the probability of being caught must be high (when the penalty is small; Moses and Savage 1992).…”
Section: Report the Results (Step 6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second procedure, the neural network model is estimated with all the selected variables as inputs, and the relative importance of every input variable is calculated. As a nonlinear model, determining the relative importance of variables is more difficult than in linear regression models, and Garson's method is used in this study, because it was proved that the neural network can identify the most influential input variables from a given variable list by Garson's method (Garson 1991), and recently, the reliability of Garson's method in the variable selection process of three-layer neural network is verified to be better than other widely used methods, such as correlation method and principal component analysis (Papatheocharous and Andreou 2010;Fischer 2015;Yousefi et al 2018;Liu et al 2018). According to Garson's method (Garson 1991), for a neural network model with N neurons in the input layer and L neurons in the hidden layer, the relative importance of the ith input variable to the kth output variable ( I ik ) can be defined as where ij is the weight of the ith neuron in the input layer and jth neuron in the hidden layer, and jk is the weight of the jth neuron in the hidden layer and kth neuron in the output layer.…”
Section: Neural Network Model Selection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F1-score is a harmonized average of precision and recall that can accurately evaluate the model's performance when the data label is imbalanced. The larger the F1-score, the better the model can be determined, and the calculation formula is presented in Equation ( 5) [41,42]. From Table 3, it can be seen that the average of the overall classification accuracy for all scenarios is 81%.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Risk Level Of Accident Severity Classification Based On The Ann (Stage 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%