2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of excitatory-inhibitory links and network topology in large-scale neuronal assemblies from multi-electrode recordings

Abstract: Functional-effective connectivity and network topology are nowadays key issues for studying brain physiological functions and pathologies. Inferring neuronal connectivity from electrophysiological recordings presents open challenges and unsolved problems. In this work, we present a cross-correlation based method for reliably estimating not only excitatory but also inhibitory links, by analyzing multi-unit spike activity from large-scale neuronal networks. The method is validated by means of realistic simulatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further work must also be done to extend this approach to the explicit identification of inhibitory inputs and their role. We note that inhibitory connections are implicitly defined in the reconstructed network; however, in contrast to more recent works [64], our analysis has not explicitly distinguished them from excitatory links. We have estimated the connectivity matrix of a sub-network which includes the strongest recurrent links in the neuronal culture, major determinants of spontaneous activity [65] that we are interested in perturbing and analyzing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Further work must also be done to extend this approach to the explicit identification of inhibitory inputs and their role. We note that inhibitory connections are implicitly defined in the reconstructed network; however, in contrast to more recent works [64], our analysis has not explicitly distinguished them from excitatory links. We have estimated the connectivity matrix of a sub-network which includes the strongest recurrent links in the neuronal culture, major determinants of spontaneous activity [65] that we are interested in perturbing and analyzing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We calculated both the incoming degree k in and the outgoing degree k out for each node, 172 and k in = k out as the neuronal networks are directed. The distributions of the incoming 173 and outgoing degrees are qualitatively the same for all the 8 DIVs and the results for 174 DIV25 are shown in Fig 4. A striking feature of the distribution of the incoming degree 175 is its approximate bimodal feature, which is in contrast to the degree distributions of 176 the chemical synapse network of C. elegans [20] and the scale-free distribution found in 177 the functional connectivity [10]. For undirected networks, there have been studies 178 indicating that the robustness against both random failures and attacks can be 179 optimized by having a bimodal degree distribution [26,27].…”
Section: Distributions Of Incoming and Outgoing Degrees 171mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation of an 147 over-representation of bidirectional connections as compared to a random network in 148 the reconstructed neuronal networks echoes previous reports for local regions of the rat 149 cortex [21][22][23][24] Thus neuronal networks are highly nonrandom. As a comparison, we 150 calculated the number of bidirectional connections in the functional connectivity 151 estimated by using the cross-covariance based methods [10] Table 2. Basic network measures of the reconstructed networks for the 8 DIVs including the connection probability p, the ratio r B of the number of bidirectionally connected pairs to the expected number N (N − 1)p 2 /2 for a random network with p, the fractions f E and f I of excitatory and inhibitory nodes, the fraction f SCC of nodes that form the strongly connected component, the characteristic path length l, the average clustering coefficient CC and the small world index SWI.…”
Section: Basic Network Features 137mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternative approaches to infer connectivity from spike trains, other than those addressed above, have employed models of sparsely and linearly interacting point processes [85], or have been designed in a model-free manner [51,86,87], for example, using CCGs [51,86] similarly to our comparisons. A general challenge in subsampled networks arises from pairwise spike train correlations at small time lags generated by shared connections from unobserved neurons, regardless of whether a direct connection is present.…”
Section: Estimation Of Synaptic Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%