2018
DOI: 10.1002/clc.23049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent LDL‐C response with evolocumab among patient subgroups in PROFICIO: A pooled analysis of 3146 patients from phase 3 studies

Abstract: Consistent reductions in LDL-C were observed in the evolocumab group regardless of demographic and disease characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there were no noteworthy differences between the global population41 and the Chinese population in terms of type or severity of the most frequently reported AEs and no noteworthy differences between the evolocumab and placebo treatment groups in either population, and the overall safety profile of evolocumab in Chinese patients was similar to that reported in previous global studies of evolocumab 23,25,37,42. Most serious AEs were not considered to be related to treatment with evolocumab.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, there were no noteworthy differences between the global population41 and the Chinese population in terms of type or severity of the most frequently reported AEs and no noteworthy differences between the evolocumab and placebo treatment groups in either population, and the overall safety profile of evolocumab in Chinese patients was similar to that reported in previous global studies of evolocumab 23,25,37,42. Most serious AEs were not considered to be related to treatment with evolocumab.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…However, there were no noteworthy differences between the global population 41 and the Chinese population in terms of type or severity of the most frequently reported AEs and no noteworthy differences between the evolocumab and placebo treatment groups in either population, and the overall safety profile of evolocumab in Chinese patients was similar to that reported in previous global studies of evolocumab. 23,25,37,42 As in the global population, although AEs of diabetes occurred more often in the evolocumab treatment group than in the placebo group (5.6% vs 2.0%) no notable changes in glycaemic control (HbA1c and FPG) in patients at Chinese centres were noted between treatment groups, and most events were mild (grades 1 or 2) in severity. Although this study was limited to a 12-week follow-up period, the efficacy and safety results are consistent with those of prior prespecified and post hoc analyses of evolocumab in patients with T2DM that have a larger sample size and/or a longer duration.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lipid‐lowering therapy status had to be unchanged for ≥4 weeks before LDL‐C screening. Patients on statin therapy at screening with an LDL‐C of ≥2.6 mmol/L and those not on statin therapy at screening with an LDL‐C of ≥3.4 mmol/L entered in a lipid stabilization period and started daily oral atorvastatin 20 mg, after which eligible patients were randomized to subcutaneous evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W), evolocumab 420 mg monthly (QM), placebo Q2W or placebo QM (2:2:1:1) added to daily oral atorvastatin 20 mg. Dosing groups were pooled in the present analysis of vitamin E and steroidal and gonadal hormones because the doses were clinically equivalent in prior analyses . The co‐primary end‐points of the BERSON study were per cent change in LDL‐C from baseline to week 12 and to the mean of weeks 10 and 12.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%