2018
DOI: 10.1177/0333102418794482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case report of isolated orbital vasculitis mimicking retinal migraine: A potential cause of recurrent transient monocular blindness and ipsilateral headache

Abstract: Background Retinal migraine is an important differential diagnosis of recurrent transient monocular blindness accompanied by headache when other etiologies are excluded. Here, we report a case of orbital vasculitis which initially mimicked retinal migraine. Case report A 47-year-old woman had recurrent episodes of fully reversible transient monocular blindness accompanied by ipsilateral headache for 15 months. The patient's neuroimaging and cardiac and ophthalmologic evaluations were normal. With a diagnosis o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the etiopathogenesis of retinal migraine remains largely unknown and controversial, proposed mechanisms include vasospasm in the retinal or ciliary vasculature and a spreading depolarization (SD) of retinal neurons similar to that in the cerebral cortex (2). Additionally, retinal migraine is a diagnosis of exclusion, requiring exclusion of other disease including amaurosis fugax and vasculitis (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the etiopathogenesis of retinal migraine remains largely unknown and controversial, proposed mechanisms include vasospasm in the retinal or ciliary vasculature and a spreading depolarization (SD) of retinal neurons similar to that in the cerebral cortex (2). Additionally, retinal migraine is a diagnosis of exclusion, requiring exclusion of other disease including amaurosis fugax and vasculitis (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%