2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15081644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Rare Disease Registries

Abstract: Rare diseases (RD) patient registries are powerful instruments that help develop clinical research, facilitate the planning of appropriate clinical trials, improve patient care, and support healthcare management. They constitute a key information system that supports the activities of European Reference Networks (ERNs) on rare diseases. A rapid proliferation of RD registries has occurred during the last years and there is a need to develop guidance for the minimum requirements, recommendations and standards ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
159
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
159
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For many years, clinicians have made efforts to improve their local patient forms and electronic systems to improve care of patients with chronic diseases [25]. For rare diseases, this is particularly important [26,27]. CF is a characteristic example of a rare disease that has benefited greatly from large long-standing registries [28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, clinicians have made efforts to improve their local patient forms and electronic systems to improve care of patients with chronic diseases [25]. For rare diseases, this is particularly important [26,27]. CF is a characteristic example of a rare disease that has benefited greatly from large long-standing registries [28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sustainability of a registry is a key challenge faced by most patient registries [35]. Agility, high quality data, robust secondary objectives, retaining patient engagement and maintenance of funding are all key aspects to support the sustainability of patient registries [36]. The sustainability of the architecture of the registry has been outlined above to retain flexibility for adding new diagnostic measures and data sources; further consideration of sustainability with regard to patient engagement and relevance of data collection and analysis will take place in the alpha phase.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This project overviewed the current situation and experience of national RDRs in Europe [6,7]. The study was used to classify RDRs [8], assess and characterize their quality [9], resulting in a set of core recommendations for RD patient registration and data collection [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%