2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.07.286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcome Differences in De Novo Versus Secondary Histiocytic Sarcomas: A Multi-institutional Experience and Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus HS can be classified as primary or secondary. In the case series of Brodwater et al, (N = 23) secondary HS presented with more aggressive behavior than de novo HS (11.8 months OS compared to 70 months, with a median difference of 58.2 months, p = 0.001) [9]. Although our case was characterized as de novo HS, its poor prognosis (OS 4 months) and marked clinical aggressiveness leads us to believe that disseminated primary bone involvement is a factor related to poor prognosis, similar to that observed in secondary HS cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus HS can be classified as primary or secondary. In the case series of Brodwater et al, (N = 23) secondary HS presented with more aggressive behavior than de novo HS (11.8 months OS compared to 70 months, with a median difference of 58.2 months, p = 0.001) [9]. Although our case was characterized as de novo HS, its poor prognosis (OS 4 months) and marked clinical aggressiveness leads us to believe that disseminated primary bone involvement is a factor related to poor prognosis, similar to that observed in secondary HS cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In a recent study published in 2018, Brodwater et al described 23 cases of HS, isolated bone involvement was not described in any of these patients [9]. In the largest case series published to date comprising 159 cases of HS from several North American centers, primary bone involvement has not been described by the authors either.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Broadwater et al reported that the survival of patients with secondary HS was very poor, with a mean survival time of 11.8 months (12). In their report, all 6 patients with secondary HS (2 patients had history of hematological malignancy and 4 patients had a history of solid tumor) received chemotherapy or radiotherapy; thus, therapy-related HS is a possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Klinicky se tyto histiocytární sarkomy chovají velmi agresivně, asi v 70 % je nemoc rozpoznána v generalizovaném stadiu (III a IV), a proto asi 60 % nemocných zemře v průběhu léčby na progresi nemoci. Medián přežití je pořád velmi krátký, jen 6 měsíců (45,46).…”
Section: Lokalizovaný Histiocytární Sarkomunclassified