“…In Uruguay, activities are organized usually in up to 4 shifts, lasting between 4 to 6 h, from 0730 to 2330 h. This scheduling maximizes school infrastructure usage and creates a natural experiment for studying the influence of the social clock on adolescent sleep and school performance. In brief, previous studies of adolescents attending different school shifts from Brazil, Mexico, and Uruguay have documented that (1) afternoon-shift students have significantly later chronotypes than morning-shift ones, (2) late chronotypes perform worse at school in the morning shift but not in the afternoon shift, (3) sleep is more advanced and shorter during school days in morning-shift students compared with afternoon-shift ones, (4) weekend sleep duration is similar among students of different shifts, and (5) morning-shift students have shorter average weekly sleep durations than afternoon-shift ones (Arrona-Palacios and Díaz-Morales, 2017; Carissimi et al, 2016; Estevan et al, 2018; Arrona-Palacios et al, 2015; Pereira et al, 2016; Valdez et al, 1996). Although it is generally accepted that cultural and social demands (entertainment, dinner time) influence circadian preferences and sleep (Owens, 2008), to our knowledge, no previous studies have examined social influences on chronotype and sleep duration aside from the school schedule.…”