2018
DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why a P-Value is Not Enough

Abstract: Scientific publications require more parameters than a P-value. Statistical results should also include effect sizes and CIs to allow for a more complete, honest, and useful interpretation of scientific findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…ML is a contemporary branch of statistics and artificial intelligence for analysis of complex data using algorithms to find data patterns that are not apparent to humans and make predictions or infer new knowledge . In ML, “A computer program is said to learn from experience with respect to some class of tasks T and performance measure P, if its performance at tasks in T, as measured by P, improves with experience.”…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML is a contemporary branch of statistics and artificial intelligence for analysis of complex data using algorithms to find data patterns that are not apparent to humans and make predictions or infer new knowledge . In ML, “A computer program is said to learn from experience with respect to some class of tasks T and performance measure P, if its performance at tasks in T, as measured by P, improves with experience.”…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial analysis included using contingency tables and Fisher's exact test to identify associated factors, confidence intervals, and distribution frequencies for ADS versus etiologic, functional, and neurologic features. 27 The univariate analysis was done using OpenEpi software 28 and the MedCalc statistical software. 29 Second step: we generated all possible combinations (tuples) from the 10 independent variables based on Combinatorics theorems, 29 and got 2^10-1 ¼ 1,023 tuples (each tuple having from 1 to 10 elements).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that for each tuple, we randomly re-shuffle the composition of training and test. On a total of 130 patients, 80% of them (104) are in the training set and 20% (26) in the test set. Composition of the training a test set was randomly determined through the R function createDa-taPartition().…”
Section: Cross Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%