2018
DOI: 10.1167/18.6.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the generalizability of eye dominance across binocular rivalry, onset rivalry, and continuous flash suppression

Abstract: It is commonly assumed that one eye is dominant over the other eye. Eye dominance is most frequently determined by using the hole-in-the-card test. However, it is currently unclear whether eye dominance as determined by the hole-in-the-card test (so-called sighting eye dominance) generalizes to tasks involving interocular conflict (engaging sensory eye dominance). We therefore investigated whether sighting eye dominance is linked to sensory eye dominance in several frequently used paradigms that involve intero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that there is a large degree of separation between the two types of dominance. One cannot simply predict the dominant eye in rivalry using sighting dominance (Coren & Kaplan, 1973;Ding, Naber, Gayet, Van der Stigchel, & Paffen, 2018;Mapp, Ono, & Barbeito, 2003). This raised the possibility that our failure to replicate an effect of exercise may be due to it only arising in cases in which the rivalry-dominant eye was patched.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It has been demonstrated that there is a large degree of separation between the two types of dominance. One cannot simply predict the dominant eye in rivalry using sighting dominance (Coren & Kaplan, 1973;Ding, Naber, Gayet, Van der Stigchel, & Paffen, 2018;Mapp, Ono, & Barbeito, 2003). This raised the possibility that our failure to replicate an effect of exercise may be due to it only arising in cases in which the rivalry-dominant eye was patched.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1(A). Recently, Ding et al suggested that eye dominance should be determined using a pretest of the same task that will be used in the experiment 27 . However, in order to be consistent with our previous studies, we continued to use the ABC test 28,29 to determine the dominant eye.…”
Section: Random Noise Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that for some people we were unable to fully characterize the effects. In order to circumvent this issue, future research could use different techniques to assess eye dominance (Ding, Naber, Gayet, Van der Stigchel, & Paffen, 2018) or determine the stimulus strength needed to estimate the full psychometric curve in a separate session. It is likely that this will increase the number of participants that show an effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%