2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR: Stressed about p53?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PFT-µ probably improve the knock-in efficiency of BFF cells by decreasing the apoptosis of cells with DSB, not by changing the cell cycle. Considering of the severe chromatin damage brought by p53 inhibition (84,85), a short-term use of p53 inhibitors not only provide a window for genome editing temporarily, but also the expression level of p53 can restoration (59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PFT-µ probably improve the knock-in efficiency of BFF cells by decreasing the apoptosis of cells with DSB, not by changing the cell cycle. Considering of the severe chromatin damage brought by p53 inhibition (84,85), a short-term use of p53 inhibitors not only provide a window for genome editing temporarily, but also the expression level of p53 can restoration (59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe deleterious consequences of Cas9-induced DNA damage, mainly DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), have been observed in some studies (57,58). What's more, some researchers have found that a single targeted DNA break is enough to cause cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in some cell types (59,60). Further experimental evidence in human pluripotent stem cells showed that introduction of DSBs at a single locus is sufficient to cause a P53-dependent molecular response and that transient suppression of the activity of p53 can improve the efficiency of precise genome engineering (60).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double-strand dna breaks created by crispr/Cas9 as part of its mechanism of action activate a gene called p53, which is known as the "guardian of the genome"-involved in the repair of dna damage and, if that damage is sufficiently significant, in apoptosis, or the destruction of the cell containing the damaged dna. It is because of these functions that p53-a tumor suppressor gene-is known to be mutated in more than half of all human cancers (Hollstein et al, 1991;Foronda and Dow, 2018); if p53 cannot carry out its normal activities, damaged cells may go on to become tumorous (Ferrarelli, 2018). This is an issue because, as one might expect, p53 blocks crispr/Cas9 activity; and it therefore follows that cells that are experimentally modified by crispr, must, thus, tolerate dna damage, and so must have deficient p53.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that such cells could be identified and eliminated by in vitro screening (Foronda and Dow, 2018), but various problems remain. Just one, single dna break seems to be sufficient to prime p53 activity, and lead to cell arrest or death (Foronda and Dow, 2018;Ihry et al, 2018), so the problem may be greater than first thought. Some have inferred or implied that this is a new discovery, but it is not: almost quarter of a century ago, this was demonstrated in human fibroblasts (Di Leonardo et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation