2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28940-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding unconstrained arm movements in primates using high-density electrocorticography signals for brain-machine interface use

Abstract: Motor deficit is among the most debilitating aspects of injury to the central nervous system. Despite ongoing progress in brain-machine interface (BMI) development and in the functional electrical stimulation of muscles and nerves, little is understood about how neural signals in the brain may be used to potentially control movement in one’s own unconstrained paralyzed limb. We recorded from high-density electrocorticography (ECoG) electrode arrays in the ventral premotor cortex (PMv) of a rhesus macaque and u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ECoGs have previously been used for decoding movements (Hu et al, 2018), speech (Mugler et al, 2014), object categories (Liu et al, 2009;Majima et al, 2014), and stimulus location and images (Lewis et al, 2016). We add to this literature by performing a direct comparison across simultaneously recorded scales, and showing that not only is ECoG efficient, but it outperforms other signals, at least in our recording conditions.…”
Section: Relationship With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…ECoGs have previously been used for decoding movements (Hu et al, 2018), speech (Mugler et al, 2014), object categories (Liu et al, 2009;Majima et al, 2014), and stimulus location and images (Lewis et al, 2016). We add to this literature by performing a direct comparison across simultaneously recorded scales, and showing that not only is ECoG efficient, but it outperforms other signals, at least in our recording conditions.…”
Section: Relationship With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The importance of vertical reach angle makes sense because upward reaches require more effort and activate different muscles than downward reaches. In addition, population neural activity has been shown to robustly encode reach direction [106, 107]. We did not include a reach angle feature sensitive to horizontal movements because reach angle distributions were skewed towards vertical angles at ±90°, as seen in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more significant factor determining the specificity of EFP/ECoG signals, therefore, might be given by the size and density of the recording electrodes. Only few studies have compared signal quality and decoding performance for the different types of subdural and intracortical arrays used in clinical and basic neuroscience studies (Kellis et al, 2016;Flint et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2017), yet it appears that many of the results indicating high signal specificity were obtained with high-density arrays and rather small electrodes (Kaiju et al, 2017;Branco et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2018;Ramsey et al, 2018). The findings of the present study that EFPs possess high spatial selectivity is clearly in line with this: With the small electrodes of our array we estimated mean ERF sizes of about 2.7 and 2.8 deg diameter (re-calculated from ERF areas assuming circular ERFs) in monkeys M1 and M3, respectively, and 4.0 deg in M2, which is around a factor of 1.6 to 2.3 of the receptive field size of intracortical LFPs, measured with the same mapping paradigm (Drebitz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%