Re-Presenting Texts 2013
DOI: 10.31826/9781463235512-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3. Translating Rabbinic Texts on the Curse of Ham: What We Learn from Charles Copher and His Critics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the racist interpretation of the curse of Ham is not confined to a single religious tradition but spans all three Abrahamic religions alike (for Christian interpretations, see (Peterson 1978;Haynes 2000Haynes , 2002; for Jewish interpretations, (Goldenberg 2003); for Muslim interpretations, (Evans 1980, pp. 26-34;Bashir 2019); for debates about the Rabbinic origins of the racist interpretation, see (Copher 1991;Aaron 1995;McKenzie 1997;Alpert 2013)). Arguably, no other sacred text in Christianity, Islam, and Judaism has been misused and abused in the interest of racism more than the curse of Ham in Gen 9:18-29.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the racist interpretation of the curse of Ham is not confined to a single religious tradition but spans all three Abrahamic religions alike (for Christian interpretations, see (Peterson 1978;Haynes 2000Haynes , 2002; for Jewish interpretations, (Goldenberg 2003); for Muslim interpretations, (Evans 1980, pp. 26-34;Bashir 2019); for debates about the Rabbinic origins of the racist interpretation, see (Copher 1991;Aaron 1995;McKenzie 1997;Alpert 2013)). Arguably, no other sacred text in Christianity, Islam, and Judaism has been misused and abused in the interest of racism more than the curse of Ham in Gen 9:18-29.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%