2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00839-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-Dimensional printing in rehabilitation: feasibility of printing an upper extremity gross motor function assessment tool

Abstract: Background Use of standardized and scientifically sound outcome measures is encouraged in clinical practice and research. With the development of newer rehabilitation therapies, we need technology-supported upper extremity outcome measures that are easily accessible, reliable and valid. 3‐Dimensional printing (3D-printing) has recently seen a meteoric rise in interest within medicine including the field of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D printed test can be accessed from anywhere and hence it practically eliminates variability related to test manufacturing, which may often affect the test scoring, accuracy and ultimately reproducibility of test results. 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 3D printed test can be accessed from anywhere and hence it practically eliminates variability related to test manufacturing, which may often affect the test scoring, accuracy and ultimately reproducibility of test results. 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment conducted at each time point for each participant for the right and the left upper extremity was treated as an independent data point. These assessments included: (a) FIM, 17 (b) SCIM, 23 (c) 3D TRI-HFT, 21 and (d) GRASSP, 14 and were completed in one session for both studies. The 3D TRI-HFT was video recorded for assessing inter and intra-rater reliability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation