2003
DOI: 10.2172/840868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D Seismic Methods for Geothermal Reservoir Exploration and Assessment--Summary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high amplitude reflector was correlated with fractured contact-metamorphic rocks, which account for over 70% of the total geothermal fluid produced at the Travale area. Other small-scale 3D and 2D seismic surveys for fractured geothermal reservoirs are known from Japan (Matsushima et al 2003), New Zealand (Lamarche 1992) and the United States (Majer 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high amplitude reflector was correlated with fractured contact-metamorphic rocks, which account for over 70% of the total geothermal fluid produced at the Travale area. Other small-scale 3D and 2D seismic surveys for fractured geothermal reservoirs are known from Japan (Matsushima et al 2003), New Zealand (Lamarche 1992) and the United States (Majer 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different approaches and various processing techniques with all their assumptions, advantages, and pitfalls have been developed largely for the HC industry and are described in detail in numerous and often voluminous textbooks (Sheriff and Geldart, 1995;Keary, Brooks, and Hill, 2002). A very good summary of seismic approaches for the geothermal context is given by Majer (2003a).…”
Section: Active Seismic Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic interpretation forms part of an integrated workflow for mapping and characterization of subsurface deposits (Brown 2011;Herron 2011), with applications ranging from hydrocarbon (Ashcroft 2011) and geothermal exploration (Majer 2003;Bredesen et al 2021) all the way to monitoring of carbon capture and storage sites (Mulrooney et al 2018;Angelo et al 2019). It is traditionally divided into two components: structural and quantitative interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%