2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D printed customizable vitrification devices for preservation of genetic resources of aquatic species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the rising popularity of low-cost resin printers, advances in LCD technologies will likely address these problems in the near future, and bring in next-generation resolution capabilities (e.g., 8K resolution). Approaches such as these can be especially powerful when presented in the form of open hardware by functioning as force multipliers in addressing large, intractable, global problems, such as ensuring quality management for germplasm repository development in aquatic species [43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rising popularity of low-cost resin printers, advances in LCD technologies will likely address these problems in the near future, and bring in next-generation resolution capabilities (e.g., 8K resolution). Approaches such as these can be especially powerful when presented in the form of open hardware by functioning as force multipliers in addressing large, intractable, global problems, such as ensuring quality management for germplasm repository development in aquatic species [43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specialized equipment was required to produce the master wafer molds. However, the evaluated designs can be used in open-hardware applications [45][46][47]. Advancements in 3-D printing have allowed for fabrication of microfluidic devices with consumer-level machines that cost <USD 400 [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, design files can be shared on a number of sites (e.g., Thingiverse, NIH 3D Print Exchange, and Github) for sharing and distribution. In this way, devices used in cryopreservation and repository development can be developed, shared, and standardized within research communities, greatly reducing costs of cryopreservation, and making reliable methods widely available [ 36 ]. However, distributed production systems such as this must be accompanied by quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) programs to ensure that samples meet minimum thresholds for repository use [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%