2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76617-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D ocean particle tracking modeling reveals extensive vertical movement and downstream interdependence of closed areas in the northwest Atlantic

Abstract: Novel 3-D passive particle tracking experiments were performed in the northwest Atlantic to elucidate connectivity among areas closed to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems. We examined (1) the degree of vertical movement of particles released at different depths and locations; (2) the location of potential source populations for the deep-sea taxa protected by the closures; and (3) the degree of functional connectivity. A long-term oceanographic dataset (EN4) was queried to characterize the temperature and sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Kenchington et al, 2019b). Experiments were therefore run for 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months (Wang et al, 2020) to encompass all likely durations. Hilario et al ( 2015) report a range of maximum PLD for five alcyonacean corals, including one gorgonian species, of 7 to 90 days, consistent with this selection of time frames.…”
Section: Lagrangian Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Kenchington et al, 2019b). Experiments were therefore run for 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months (Wang et al, 2020) to encompass all likely durations. Hilario et al ( 2015) report a range of maximum PLD for five alcyonacean corals, including one gorgonian species, of 7 to 90 days, consistent with this selection of time frames.…”
Section: Lagrangian Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive models of species distributions, when presented with associated levels of uncertainty, enable managers to make informed decisions on the trade-offs implicit in marine spatial planning (Lester et al, 2013;Grorud-Colvert et al, 2014;Carr, 2019;Metaxas et al, 2019), while insight into the impacts of climate change on the size and configuration of suitable habitat, can improve network design (Santos et al, 2020). Meanwhile, Lagrangian particle tracking (LPT) models are valuable for assessing connectivity (e.g., Bracco et al, 2019;Kenchington et al, 2019b;Metaxas et al, 2019;Zeng et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2021), and can provide independent support for the evaluation of species distribution models (Kenchington et al, 2019b;Wang et al, 2021). In LPT models, virtual "particles" are advected by flow fields derived from numerical ocean models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those results have been challenged (Lanna and Riesgo, 2020) and even if valid, there remains a lack of information on the directionality of sponge larval swimming behavior needed to make use of the information in particle tracking models. Vertical distribution has important consequences for larval transport and dispersal trajectories (Edwards et al, 2007;Gary et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020). However, the vertical movements of V. pourtalesii larvae, like those of many sponge species, remain unknown (Kenchington et al, 2019), although settlement of V. pourtalesii has been observed on artificial substrates about 5 m off the bottom (Busch et al, 2020).…”
Section: Biological Traits Of V Pourtalesii For Particle Tracking Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the two ocean models differ in a number of key aspects: ( 1 (2) BNAM is a prognostic model, with outputs obtained from governing equations directly, which accords with the physical processes. In contrast, GLORYS12V1 is a data-assimilative model, created by assimilating model output from the NEMO 3.1 ocean model and the LIM2 EVP sea ice model with observational data (Reijnders, 2020); (3) The surface forcing of BNAM is taken from a combination of CORE (Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments) and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis forcing. Model forcing variables include air temperature, wind velocities and humidity; daily short-and long-wave radiation, and total precipitation (rain plus snow) (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Inter-model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation