2020
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2020.2968208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D Multistatic Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging for Augmented Reality Visualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major challenge is the localization problem (Pereira et al, 2020), that is, how to guarantee the accuracy of the superimposition to deploy AR technologies. Traditionally, abstaining location information required merging data from blueprints, historical records, dead reckoning, and aboveground sensors, which are time-consuming and lack accuracy (Li et al, 2015).…”
Section: Underground Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major challenge is the localization problem (Pereira et al, 2020), that is, how to guarantee the accuracy of the superimposition to deploy AR technologies. Traditionally, abstaining location information required merging data from blueprints, historical records, dead reckoning, and aboveground sensors, which are time-consuming and lack accuracy (Li et al, 2015).…”
Section: Underground Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, GPR data reconstruction methods with metric information are popular researched in recent years as well. University of Vermont's research group has published several papers [7], [8] on GPR-based reconstruction using multistatic air-coupled GPR. They first collect the data from different GPR antenna, and further take each obtained gain of GPR data into consideration; moreover, to remove the noise, they also fuse the data with a Hessian-based enhancement filter, which is novel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 3D modeling and visualization of underground geohazards can provide continence for geohazards presentation and analysis. With the idea of addressing some of these limitations, some research articles [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] have discussed different ways to visualize the information from underground space. These have made important contributions to the architectural design of underground information systems and the related representation methods of underground structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works [9,10,17,18,23] used the GPR data to visualize two-dimensional space, but their systems cannot construct intuitive three-dimensional (3D) scenes nor can they assess the countermeasures accurately. Recently, Mauricio [24] proposed a processing workflow of GPR data to create 3D models of subsurface tubular structures, which adopted image reconstruction and enhancement technologies. Other research [11][12][13]16] adopted three-dimensional GPR to construct 3D scenes that used commercial software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%