2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D modeling and analysis of meander-line-coil surface wave EMATs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An EMAT sensor typically consists of a permanent magnet providing a large static magnetic field and a coil carrying an alternating current which is placed next to the test piece [19][20][21]. There are two EMAT interactions which can produce ultrasound: magnetostriction for magnetic materials and the Lorentz force mechanism for conducting metallic materials [18,20,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An EMAT sensor typically consists of a permanent magnet providing a large static magnetic field and a coil carrying an alternating current which is placed next to the test piece [19][20][21]. There are two EMAT interactions which can produce ultrasound: magnetostriction for magnetic materials and the Lorentz force mechanism for conducting metallic materials [18,20,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that, for the EMATs modelling, the dynamic magnetic field was neglected due to the small excitation AC current (5 A) used in this work; The effect of the dynamic magnetic field generated by the meander-line-coil must be considered when the excitation current is large as it is one of the mechanisms to generate ultrasound waves; [32] suggested, when the excitation exceeds 528.9 A, the dynamic magnetic field plays a more significant role than the static magnetic field, which is generated by the permanent magnet. Therefore, the vertical forces, which are generated by the dynamic magnetic field and the eddy current, are neglected in this work.…”
Section: Emat-em Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason we choose a dense source points is that lots of source points guarantee the wave interference' integrity. Shear waves' velocity C s 3.14 mm/μs [32] Rayleigh waves' velocity C R 2.93 mm/μs [32] The meander-line-coil is located on the centre of the aluminium plate, so the whole EMAT-UT model is symmetrical with y=300 mm; in order to improve the modelling time, only the left half of the geometry is modelled. Only the area, y from 0 to 250 mm, is presented where the signals are significant.…”
Section: Emat-ut Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [99] proposed an enhancement to the previous FEA models of an EMAT, taking into account a dynamic magnetic field in a meander coil, coming up with the distribution of eddy currents, static magnetic field, Lorentz forces and resultant elastic waves. The FEA results corroborated with an experiment.…”
Section: Emats (Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducers)mentioning
confidence: 99%