2019
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggz014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D inversion of transient EM data with topography using unstructured tetrahedral grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implicit scheme is based on solving Equation (2). In order to improve the accuracy, the second-order backward Euler method is used to discretize time derivatives [4], e.g., ∂e ∂t is approximated as:…”
Section: Implicit Scheme Using the Backward Euler Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The implicit scheme is based on solving Equation (2). In order to improve the accuracy, the second-order backward Euler method is used to discretize time derivatives [4], e.g., ∂e ∂t is approximated as:…”
Section: Implicit Scheme Using the Backward Euler Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TEM forward modeling can be implemented in frequency-domain and thereafter transformed to time-domain using the Fourier transform. However, the frequency-domain approach generally requires a sufficiently dense and wide frequency range to ensure the accuracy of the solution [4]. Alternatively, the simulation can be implemented directly in the time-domain so that the electromagnetic (EM) fields are recursively advanced using time-stepping [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, the numerical simulation methods for 3D electromagnetic method mainly include the integral equation method (Wannamaker et al ., 1984; Zhdanov et al ., 2006), the finite‐difference method (Commer & Newman, 2004; Yu et al., 2017), the finite volume (FV) method (Weiss & Constable, 2006; Haber et al ., 2007a) and the finite element (FE) method (Key & Ovall, 2011; Sliva et al ., 2012; Cai et al ., 2014). Compared with other methods, the FE method with an unstructured mesh can provide accurate results for complex geological models with topography (Liu et al ., 2019). The FE method usually results in a large linear system of equations in the forward modelling, which can be difficult/time intensive to solve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the free space between the topography and the airborne draping surface or the satellite observation surface is not contained within the inverse model, it still needs to be considered in forward modeling, which inevitably increases the cost of forward modeling. Considering relevant existing research on other geophysical methods, such as electromagnetic (EM) (Liu et al, 2019;Rücker 2006aRücker , 2006bUsui, 2015) and seismic techniques (Dumbser & Käser, 2006), unstructured tetrahedral grids exhibit good performance in the modeling of complex topography, and geometries at arbitrary resolutions, and high accuracy in the interpretation of inversion results (Darijani et al, 2021;Lelièvre & Farquharson, 2013). Therefore, in this study, we propose that the abovementioned challenges should be addressed by developing 3-D magnetic data numerical forward modeling and inversion methods with an unstructured tetrahedral grid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%