2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2017.2686386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D Domain Decomposition Based Hybrid Finite-Difference Time-Domain/Finite-Element Time-Domain Method With Nonconformal Meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to alleviate such condition, the subgridding method is one of the most widely spread and efficient methods. However, the existed subgridding method shows limitation in curves simulation at interfaces of different meshes due to the interpretation operation 22–24 . To alleviate such condition, an alternative subgridding method in proposed in non‐uniform curve meshes.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to alleviate such condition, the subgridding method is one of the most widely spread and efficient methods. However, the existed subgridding method shows limitation in curves simulation at interfaces of different meshes due to the interpretation operation 22–24 . To alleviate such condition, an alternative subgridding method in proposed in non‐uniform curve meshes.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFS‐PML formulation shows advantages in low‐frequency evanescent waves and late‐time reflections 21 . For nonuniform domains, subgridding method exhibits appreciable advantages in accuracy and efficiency compared with FDTD algorithm which shows great potential in investigation 22 . However, the existed method shows its limitation in accuracy due to the interpretation operation in curves simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each and every case, the superscript ∆ represents the value of different variables for the finite element indicated by ∆. [ 25,26 ] Equation (9) shows that the four matrices are required for the solution of the FEM problem. Some of the matrices have already been explained in Equation (9): ζand R ; the remaining two matrices Z and W¯ require explaining.…”
Section: Galerkin Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the boundary treatment scheme of FDTD/PE hybrid method, similar schemes can be found in other mixed numerical methods. In [7], a buffer is used to implement the coupling between FDTD and FETD regions. In [8], there is a cubic layer between the SETD region and the FDTD region, and an explicit SETD/FDTD hybrid approach is put forward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%