2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017gc007278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3‐D Characterization of Detrital Zircon Grains and its Implications for Fluvial Transport, Mixing, and Preservation Bias

Abstract: Detrital zircon studies can suffer from selective loss of provenance information due to U‐Pb age discordance, metamictization, metamorphic overprinting and fluviatile transport processes. The relationship between isotopic composition and zircon grain shape, and how grain shape is modified during transport, is largely unknown. We combine X‐ray tomography with U‐Pb geochronology to quantify how fluvial transport affects 3‐D zircon shape, detrital age signature, and grain density along the Murchison River, whose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) Regardless of n, further documenting (and quantifying) morphological information for crystals dated in detrital zircon studies will continue to illuminate the systematic relationships between physico-mechanical and age biasing that are prevalent in different sedimentary environments (e.g., Finzel, 2017;Markwitz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Regardless of n, further documenting (and quantifying) morphological information for crystals dated in detrital zircon studies will continue to illuminate the systematic relationships between physico-mechanical and age biasing that are prevalent in different sedimentary environments (e.g., Finzel, 2017;Markwitz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spencer et al, 2018). The K erosion factor assesses the relative representation of a certain source within a catchment and compares this to the relative abundances of the erosive products of the sources in a sediment (Dhuime et al, 2011;Markwitz et al, 2017;Spencer et al, 2018); (iii) integrated provenance fingerprinting on single mineral phases (for example, trace elements, Hf-isotopes, thermochronology and geochronology in zircon) is capable of more uniquely identifying source regions that might otherwise be indistinguishable on one character alone, while also tracking a broader range of geological processes of interest (Campbell et al, 2005;Reiners et al, 2005;Xu et al, 2017;Kirkland et al, 2020); and (iv) measuring extremely large grain populations to ensure full characterization of minor components and applying statistics to understand the limitations of what fraction of any population has been represented (Vermeesch, 2004;Andersen, 2005;Pullen et al, 2014). Despite this progress, the well-known, but poorly quantified potential of sediment recycling remains extremely relevant for sediment system understanding (Andersen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Biases In Provenance Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implicitly assume that comminution and abrasion are minimal when utilizing zircon isotope systematics, but this may not necessarily be true. For example, granites with high U-bearing zircons may be more prone to metamictization and chemical alteration, which consequently reduces their ability to be transported across long distances (Markwitz et al, 2017b). Another issue that is not addressed is the homogeneity of zircon fertility of each of the basement terranes throughout their erosion and transport into the Perth Basin (Spencer et al, in press).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%