Treatise on Geomorphology 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-374739-6.00052-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3.9 GIS-Based Soil Erosion Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
41
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The change in RR parameter values is dictated more by variation in soil texture with different magnitude of initial surface roughness than the impact of rainfall. In contrast to the relative Ac exponent values of 0.4–0.6 identified by Govers () and Mitasova et al (), the current study predicted lower values. This may be attributed to the difference in experimental conditions and consideration of small size of rills, which need further research under medium rill size conditions.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The change in RR parameter values is dictated more by variation in soil texture with different magnitude of initial surface roughness than the impact of rainfall. In contrast to the relative Ac exponent values of 0.4–0.6 identified by Govers () and Mitasova et al (), the current study predicted lower values. This may be attributed to the difference in experimental conditions and consideration of small size of rills, which need further research under medium rill size conditions.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The current research results confirmed that due to the rougher surfaces in the form of ridges and depressions, a gradual effect on rill initiation occurred when rainfall increased. (1991) and Mitasova et al (2013), the current study predicted lower values. This may be attributed to the difference in experimental conditions and consideration of small size of rills, which need further research under medium rill size conditions.…”
Section: Figurecontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations