2004
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-2-30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Sequence-based typing (SBT) is one of the most comprehensive methods utilized for HLA typing. However, one of the inherent problems with this typing method is the interpretation of ambiguous allele combinations which occur when two or more different allele combinations produce identical sequences. The purpose of this study is to investigate the probability of this occurrence. We performed HLA-A,-B SBT for Exons 2 and 3 on 676 donors. Samples were analyzed with a capillary sequencer. The racial distribution of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional PCR-based genotyping approaches incorporating restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) ( 9 ), single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) ( 10 ), sequence-specific oligonucleotides (PCR-SSO) ( 11 ), sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) ( 12 ), and Sanger sequencing-based typing (PCR-SBT) ( 13 ) have been used for HLA-testing in disease association and pre-transplantation ( 14 16 ) analysis. However, these methods are limited in their ability to decipher chromosomal phase ( cis/trans ) ambiguity and/or imprecise allele identification ( 17 , 18 ) and may leave multiple pairs of HLA gene alleles unresolved. Moreover, the traditional methods focus only on the variations in the highly polymorphic regions of the HLA genes, and thus the majority of the assays only interrogate exons 2 and 3 or exons 2, 3, and 4 of the class I loci and exons 2 or exons 2 and 3 of class II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional PCR-based genotyping approaches incorporating restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) ( 9 ), single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) ( 10 ), sequence-specific oligonucleotides (PCR-SSO) ( 11 ), sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) ( 12 ), and Sanger sequencing-based typing (PCR-SBT) ( 13 ) have been used for HLA-testing in disease association and pre-transplantation ( 14 16 ) analysis. However, these methods are limited in their ability to decipher chromosomal phase ( cis/trans ) ambiguity and/or imprecise allele identification ( 17 , 18 ) and may leave multiple pairs of HLA gene alleles unresolved. Moreover, the traditional methods focus only on the variations in the highly polymorphic regions of the HLA genes, and thus the majority of the assays only interrogate exons 2 and 3 or exons 2, 3, and 4 of the class I loci and exons 2 or exons 2 and 3 of class II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HLA genotyping methods mainly applied today are PCR-SSOP, such as the Luminex commercial methodology [ 25 , 26 ], and SBT by the Sanger method employing capillary sequencing based on chain-termination reactions [ 14 , 27 ]. However, both methods often detect more than one pair of unresolved HLA alleles because of chromosomal phase ( cis/trans ) ambiguity [ 28 - 30 ]. To solve the phase ambiguity problem, we previously reported the development and application of the super high resolution-single molecule-sequence-based typing (SS-SBT) method using long-range PCR of the sample DNA from the promoter-enhancer region to the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) for 11 classical HLA loci, HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRB3/4/5, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DPA1, and HLA-DPB1 in combination with next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms such as Ion PGM (Life Technologies) and GS Junior (Roche) [ 31 - 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breaking the cis -linkage among SNPs is one of the main drawbacks of some HLA typing methods (e.g., SBT) as it can hamper the typing of heterozygous individuals [43]. By basing the novel platform on the PCR-SSP method, we were able to preserve both the information about the polymorphisms and their linkage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%