2015
DOI: 10.1299/jsmermd.2015._2p1-d08_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2P1-D08 Study on Telexistence LXXXI : Effectiveness of Spatial Coherent Remote Driving Experience with a Telexistence Backhoe Under Hazardous Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [8], similar to our work, present results from remote-operation of an excavator over a wireless IP network. They use a head mount display (HMD) with end to end latency of 180 milliseconds and report 164% Related research on automatic bucket-filling is the work done on Load-haul-dump (LHD) machines, which are a variation of wheel-loaders adapted for underground mines.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Reference [8], similar to our work, present results from remote-operation of an excavator over a wireless IP network. They use a head mount display (HMD) with end to end latency of 180 milliseconds and report 164% Related research on automatic bucket-filling is the work done on Load-haul-dump (LHD) machines, which are a variation of wheel-loaders adapted for underground mines.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Remote-operated construction machinery is being tried for commercial purposes [13,14]. However, this has led to a greater reduction in productivity and fuel efficiency [15] than manual operation because there are not enough sensory inputs to the remote operators. Therefore, to increase the fuel efficiency and productivity of construction machinery, it is necessary to improve the degree of automation of the loader to reduce the operator's remote intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], the remote control of an excavator over a wireless IP network using a head mount display (HMD) with an end-to-end latency of 180 ms reports a 164% increase in the cycle time of operation time for remote control, compared to manual operation. The amount of tolerable latency for teleoperation varies a lot between different experiments, and the variation in latency (jitter) can be more detrimental to performance than the latency itself [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%