2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-007-0043-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D vs. 3D Deformable Face Models: Representational Power, Construction, and Real-Time Fitting

Abstract: Abstract.Model-based face analysis is a general paradigm with applications that include face recognition, expression recognition, lip-reading, head pose estimation, and gaze estimation. A face model is first constructed from a collection of training data, either 2D images or 3D range scans. The face model is then fit to the input image(s) and the model parameters used in whatever the application is. Most existing face models can be classified as either 2D (e.g. Active Appearance Models) or 3D (e.g. Morphable M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
46
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Head pose was measured from the 2D videos using a cylindrical head tracker of [19]. This tracker is person-independent, robust, and has concurrent validity with person-specific 2D+3D AAM [20] and with magnetic motion capture device [19]. The head pose (yaw, roll, and pitch) were measured with respect to the frontal pose.…”
Section: B Head Posementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head pose was measured from the 2D videos using a cylindrical head tracker of [19]. This tracker is person-independent, robust, and has concurrent validity with person-specific 2D+3D AAM [20] and with magnetic motion capture device [19]. The head pose (yaw, roll, and pitch) were measured with respect to the frontal pose.…”
Section: B Head Posementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of NRSFM is to recover 3-D shape models from 2-D tracked landmarks, while SPA builds unbiased 2-D models from 3-D data. The learned 2-D model has the same representational power of a 3-D model but leads to faster fitting algorithms [15]. SPA uniformly samples the space of possible 3-D rigid transformations, and it is extremely efficient in space and time.…”
Section: Object (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard active appearance models (2D AAMs) [29], [30] are not directly comparable to G-flow because they are purely 2D models, which track in the 2D image plane without regard to the 3D configuration of the vertices. However, there is a 3D extension of the active appearance model, the so-called combined 2D+3D active appearance model (2D+3D AAM) [8], [28], which is a real-time, online 3D tracking system. We classify it as a template-based model because its appearance model does not change over time.…”
Section: Relation To Other Algorithms For Tracking 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps this system's biggest weakness is that it cannot handle self- The table compares the features of G-flow with those of other approaches. The approaches compared are (left to right): Constrained optic flow [9], [10], [11]; 2D+3D active appearance models [8], [28]; the 3D generative template model of [7]; and our G-flow model.…”
Section: Relation To Other Algorithms For Tracking 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation