“…This is because of the electrocatalytic activity of the nanomaterials, and these nanomaterials increase the conductivity, surface area, porosity, surface energy, reactivity, and catalytic active sites of the modified electrode. In addition, some nanomaterial-modified electrodes exhibit high sensitivity and low detection levels even at in the range from nanomolar to femtomolar concentrations (modifiers include MWCNTS/CTAB, 69 SWCNTS/gold nanoparticles, 70 platinum–rhenium nanoparticles-decorated porous activated carbon, 77 gold nanoparticle/carbon nitrite/graphene, 83 rGo/Cu 2 S, 91 GO- N -hydroxysuccinimide-Au nanoparticles, 92 2D TiC/rGO, 94 SnS 2 /SnO 2 /graphene, 96 MoS 2 /SPE, 102 Co-doped Fe 3 O 4 nanosphere/GO, 103 ZrP, 105 Zn/W nanoparticles, 106 g-C 3 N 4 -MnWO 4 , 107 Mn 2 O 3 -TNS, 109 Eu 2 O 3 NPs/rGO, 111 MnSnO 3 NPs, 112 Ho 3+ /Co 3 O 4 , 114 CoMoO 4 /BCN, 117 XC-72/MIL-101(Cr), 120 EPC, 121 Y-DNA-NMOF, 122 NMOF-Biocodes, 123 FeNC, 124 NiCo 2 O 4 /carbon, 27 Pt-TF-ME, 128 CNTs-PDA-Au-NPs, 129 MoN/S-GCN, 62 and GNF 132 ). However, there is little literature reported on the simultaneous detection of CP and FZ in commercial and real samples by electrochemical techniques.…”