2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D Short-Time Fourier Transform for local morphological analysis of meibomian gland images

Abstract: Meibography is becoming an integral part of dry eye diagnosis. Being objective and repeatable this imaging technique is used to guide treatment decisions and determine the disease status. Especially desirable is the possibility of automatic (or semi-automatic) analysis of a meibomian image for quantification of a particular gland’s feature. Recent reports suggest that in addition to the measure of gland atrophy (quantified by the well-established “drop-out area” parameter), the gland’s morphological changes ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, different OF estimation methods have been proposed, including gradient-based methods ( Awad, 2016 ; Li et al, 2018 ), slit-based approaches ( Oliveira & Leite, 2008 ), frequency domain-based estimations ( Ciezar & Pochylski, 2022 ; Park & Park, 2005 ), learning-based models ( Cao & Jain, 2018 ; Qu et al, 2018 ), and gray-level variance methods ( Dyre & Sumathi, 2017 ; Bian et al, 2019 ; Turroni et al, 2011 ). Currently, the most popular of these fingerprint image OF estimation approaches is the gradient-based method because of its high resolution, high accuracy, and low computational demand ( Turroni et al, 2011 ; Sharma & Dey, 2019 ; Ratha, Chen & Jain, 1995 ; Gottschlich, Mihailescu & Munk, 2009 ; Bazen & Gerez, 2002 ; Liu & Dai, 2006 ; Kekre & Bharadi, 2009 ; Mei, Sun & Xia, 2009 ; Wieclaw, 2013 ; Wang, Hu & Han, 2007 ; Bazen & Gerez, 2000 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, different OF estimation methods have been proposed, including gradient-based methods ( Awad, 2016 ; Li et al, 2018 ), slit-based approaches ( Oliveira & Leite, 2008 ), frequency domain-based estimations ( Ciezar & Pochylski, 2022 ; Park & Park, 2005 ), learning-based models ( Cao & Jain, 2018 ; Qu et al, 2018 ), and gray-level variance methods ( Dyre & Sumathi, 2017 ; Bian et al, 2019 ; Turroni et al, 2011 ). Currently, the most popular of these fingerprint image OF estimation approaches is the gradient-based method because of its high resolution, high accuracy, and low computational demand ( Turroni et al, 2011 ; Sharma & Dey, 2019 ; Ratha, Chen & Jain, 1995 ; Gottschlich, Mihailescu & Munk, 2009 ; Bazen & Gerez, 2002 ; Liu & Dai, 2006 ; Kekre & Bharadi, 2009 ; Mei, Sun & Xia, 2009 ; Wieclaw, 2013 ; Wang, Hu & Han, 2007 ; Bazen & Gerez, 2000 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned studies have proposed various approaches to quantify visible Meibomian gland structure, which have successfully replaced other conventional approaches such as thresholding, edge detection, region growing, and clustering. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 These approaches rely on predefined rules and heuristics to identify and segment different regions of an image. In contrast, deep learning methods use neural networks to learn representations of features directly from the image data, without the need for manual feature engineering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%