2016
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D shear-wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) evaluation of ablation zone following radiofrequency ablation of liver lesions: is it more accurate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This becomes the theoretical basis for our use of elastography to detect lesions. Xu et al [ 28 ] used SWE to measure the elasticity of RFA lesions and indicated it could qualitatively and quantitatively measure the ablation zones. Tian et al [ 29 ] conducted research on measuring the elasticity of the extracorporeal liver after ablation, which indicated that the SWE measurement of hardness was not affected by the gas, and it could indicate the region of the ablation zone clearly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This becomes the theoretical basis for our use of elastography to detect lesions. Xu et al [ 28 ] used SWE to measure the elasticity of RFA lesions and indicated it could qualitatively and quantitatively measure the ablation zones. Tian et al [ 29 ] conducted research on measuring the elasticity of the extracorporeal liver after ablation, which indicated that the SWE measurement of hardness was not affected by the gas, and it could indicate the region of the ablation zone clearly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 884 patients were enrolled in the study, divided into the modeling group ( n = 720) and the validation group ( n = 164). These patients met specific criteria[ 16 , 17 ]: Conventional ultrasound identified one or more solid liver lesions with a maximum depth of less than 8 cm. In SWE quality mode, liver cancer lesions appeared green, indicating accurate SWE measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%