2017
DOI: 10.1007/jhep10(2017)035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D Seiberg-like dualities with an adjoint matter

Abstract: Abstract:We consider the analogue of Kutasov-Schwimmer-Seiberg duality for twodimensional N = (2, 2) U(k) gauge theory with one adjoint X with the superpotential Tr X l+1 and with fundamental and anti-fundamental chiral multiplets. We give the evidences for the proposed dualities by analytically proving that the elliptic genus of dual pair coincides with each other. For some of the dual pairs flowing to the superconformal field theory, we show the nonperturbative truncation of the chiral ring. For the theory w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have two more chiral operators than the allowed monopole states. However, since we already have an imposed relation among those operators, (Tr 1 X) 2 |1, 1, 0, 0 , Tr 1 X 2 |1, 1, 0, 0 , (Tr 1 X) (Tr 2 X) |1, 1, 0, 0 , (Tr 2 X) 2 |1, 1, 0, 0 , Tr 2 X 2 |1, 1, 0, 0 (C. 26) while the allowed chiral operators composed of the lower dimensional monopole operators are (X 1 ) 2 W + 0 , X 2 W + 0 , X 1 V , which span the monopole states (C.26) together with composites of the lower dimensional monopole operators. We emphasize that while we don't specify the exact map between those two operators and the monopole states in (C.26), from the counting, we do know that those two, which carry global charges…”
Section: Topological Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have two more chiral operators than the allowed monopole states. However, since we already have an imposed relation among those operators, (Tr 1 X) 2 |1, 1, 0, 0 , Tr 1 X 2 |1, 1, 0, 0 , (Tr 1 X) (Tr 2 X) |1, 1, 0, 0 , (Tr 2 X) 2 |1, 1, 0, 0 , Tr 2 X 2 |1, 1, 0, 0 (C. 26) while the allowed chiral operators composed of the lower dimensional monopole operators are (X 1 ) 2 W + 0 , X 2 W + 0 , X 1 V , which span the monopole states (C.26) together with composites of the lower dimensional monopole operators. We emphasize that while we don't specify the exact map between those two operators and the monopole states in (C.26), from the counting, we do know that those two, which carry global charges…”
Section: Topological Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, new exact expressions were also obtained for correlation functions of certain half-BPS local operators in two-dimensional non-abelian gauge theories [10][11][12], generalizing the seminal results of [13][14][15]. See also [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] for related works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the dual theory, we find instead: 28) where the last factor is the contribution from the mesons M i j . For any pair of dual vacua {σ a } and {σ D a }, it is easy to see that:…”
Section: Jhep08(2017)101mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus we have to work out each case separately so that check of the dualities are done for small rank of the gauge groups and small number of matter multiplets. Furthermore for the U (k) theory, equality of the elliptic genus of the dual pair can be shown analytically [10]. Here we manage to prove the equality of the elliptic genus of the dual pair for small k, N and numerically check the equality of the elliptic genus of the dual pair for more complicated cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also additional difficulty arises when evaluating the elliptic genus of the theory with SO(k)/O(k) groups. For U (k) theory with fundamental flavors and adjoint chiral multiplets, the general formulae of the elliptic genus are known since the classification of the nontrivial JK-residues are possible [10]. However for the theory with SO(k)/O(k) gauge group with N fundamental multiplets, such general results are not known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%