2007
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D‐RNA‐coupling numbers: A new computational chemistry approach to link secondary structure topology with biological function

Abstract: Methods for prediction of proteins, DNA, or RNA function and mapping it onto sequence often rely on bioinformatics alignment approach instead of chemical structure. Consequently, it is interesting to develop computational chemistry approaches based on molecular descriptors. In this sense, many researchers used sequence-coupling numbers and our group extended them to 2D proteins representations. However, no coupling numbers have been reported for 2D-RNA topology graphs, which are highly branched and contain use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 LDA is a simpler classifier than SVM that is adopted to solve biological structure-function problems. [32][33][34] People may argue with our reasons for selecting SVM as the method herein. Therefore, the classification performance of LDA and SVM were compared initially.…”
Section: Creation and Evaluation Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…31 LDA is a simpler classifier than SVM that is adopted to solve biological structure-function problems. [32][33][34] People may argue with our reasons for selecting SVM as the method herein. Therefore, the classification performance of LDA and SVM were compared initially.…”
Section: Creation and Evaluation Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Predicted secondary structures of RNA molecules can provide valuable information, as they could reveal the functions of RNA molecules (Gonzalez-Diaz et al 2007) and help in the understanding of RNA folding -since RNAs often fold hierarchically (Brion and Westhof 1997). They can also be used for RNA comparison (Gan et al 2003), and for predicting three-dimensional RNA structures (Shapiro et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can calculate Topological Indices (TIs) for all these classes of networks representations in order to make a numerical description of DNA and protein sequences (González-Díaz et al, 2008). These descriptors (also known as connectivity indices) allow establishing a relation between the biological properties in small and large molecules (QSAR/QSPR), like proteins and genes, and their molecular structure; without to rely upon sequence alignment (Caballero et al, 2007;Cai and Chou, 2005;Cruz-Monteagudo et al, 2007;Chou and Cai, 2003;Chou and Cai, 2005;Chou and Shen, 2008a;Estrada et al, 2006;Estrada et al, 2002;Fernandez et al, 2007a;Fernandez et al, 2007b;González-Díaz et al, 2007a;González-Díaz et al, 2007b;González-Díaz and Uriarte, 2005;Hall et al, 2003;Molina et al, 2004;Prado-Prado et al, 2007;Vilar et al, 2006;Xiao et al, 2009a). Therefore, these methodologies could be an alternative to sequence alignment for the study of proteins and genes (Durand et al, A c c e p t e d m a n u s c r i p t 5 1997; Hansen et al, 1996;Hofacker et al, 2002;Lecompte et al, 2001;Persson, 2000;Standley et al, 2001;Zhang and Madden, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%