2021
DOI: 10.1002/smsc.202100097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D Palladium Sulphate for Visible‐Light‐Driven Optoelectronic Reversible Gas Sensing at Room Temperature

Abstract: 2D metal sulphides (MSs) have attracted enormous amounts of attention in developing high‐performance gas sensors. 2D noble metal sulphides and their derivatives, however, have been less studied due to their predominant nonlayered crystal structures for inefficient exfoliation, despite their surface and peculiar optoelectronic properties. Herein, we successfully synthesize 2D palladium sulphate (PdSO4) from palladium sulphide (PdS) bulk crystals by liquid‐phase exfoliation, in which the presence of oxygen speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystal transformation was confirmed by the XRD pattern. From Figure 1 c, the feature peaks of hexagonal cobalt sulfide at 31.3°, 35.3°, 47.2° and 55.0° can be ascribed as the crystal plane of (100), (101), (102), and (110), which is in good agreement with the reported literatures [ 41 , 42 ]. Such a crystal structure was transformed to an orthorhombic system (space group Pnma , a = 8.62400 Å, b = 6.71500 Å, and c = 4.74400 Å) after the annealing treatment, showing the distinct peaks at 31.3°, 36.8°, 44.8°, 59.3°, and 65.2°, matching well with the simulated lattice plane of (211), (002), (410), (141), and (422) of cobalt oxysulfide [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The crystal transformation was confirmed by the XRD pattern. From Figure 1 c, the feature peaks of hexagonal cobalt sulfide at 31.3°, 35.3°, 47.2° and 55.0° can be ascribed as the crystal plane of (100), (101), (102), and (110), which is in good agreement with the reported literatures [ 41 , 42 ]. Such a crystal structure was transformed to an orthorhombic system (space group Pnma , a = 8.62400 Å, b = 6.71500 Å, and c = 4.74400 Å) after the annealing treatment, showing the distinct peaks at 31.3°, 36.8°, 44.8°, 59.3°, and 65.2°, matching well with the simulated lattice plane of (211), (002), (410), (141), and (422) of cobalt oxysulfide [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The sensor was also tested towards 1% H 2 at 40% relative humidity (RH). As shown in Figure S5 , the response factor of cobalt sulfide sensor slightly drops ~4% in a humidified environment compared to that of the dry condition possibly due to the adsorption of water vapor [ 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11][12][13] Up to now, a variety of non-layered materials have been synthesized successfully in the 2D ultrathin form, including noble metals (such as Au, Ag, and Pd), metal oxides (such as TiO 2 , In 2 O 3 , and WO 3 ), and metal sulphides (such as PdS, CuS, CdS, and In 2 S 3 ) utilizing diverse exfoliation techniques ranging from novel methods to facile and environmentally friendly exfoliation techniques. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] In particular, silver sulphide (Ag 2 S) has stimulated enormous interest due to its potential applications in photoconductors, photovoltaics, and gas-sensing applications owing to its intrinsic electrical and electronics properties. 19,[23][24][25] Using wet chemical exfoliation, recent work has successfully exfoliated 2D Ag 2 S nanosheets from their bulk counterpart, exhibiting small lateral dimensions and a thickness of B40 nm, a narrow bandgap of 1.51 eV, and excellent optical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In metal chalcogenides, the formal stoichiometry of 2D materials is MX, MX 2 , and MX 3 (M: metal, X: chalcogen). Materials such as MoS 2 , [ 13 ] MoSe, [ 14 ] PdS, [ 15 ] and SnS [ 16 ] demonstrated high sensitivity and selectivity to NO 2 at low temperatures, but there was a problem with the recovery rate. The optical method exhibits a fast response and recovery rate, but has cost limitations and is difficult to apply in MEMS gas sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%