Landslides and Engineered Slopes. Experience, Theory and Practice 2018
DOI: 10.1201/9781315375007-79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D Modelling of rockslide displacements by non-linear time dependent relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the long‐term evolution of the geometry, internal structure, strength, and hydrology of alpine rocks slopes is usually unknown and poorly described by models focused on the analysis of onset mechanisms of rock slope failure and their topographic, lithological, structural, and climatic controls (Agliardi et al, ; Ambrosi & Crosta, ). Attempts to model different stages of long‐term alpine rock slope evolution must face several caveats , including (a) limitations of rheological approaches to the time‐dependent modeling of slope evolution, unless a landslide shear zone is predetermined (De Caro et al, ); (b) lack of knowledge regarding progressive evolution of fractures under nearly constant gravitational stress conditions; (c) almost unknown spatial and temporal water distribution in the slope during and after deglaciation (Crosta et al, ; McColl, ); (d) limited knowledge of the damage‐dependent evolution of rock mass permeability on the scale and stress conditions of rock slopes; and (e) limited understanding of hydromechanical controls on rockslide differentiation, as a major input to the development of rockslide forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the long‐term evolution of the geometry, internal structure, strength, and hydrology of alpine rocks slopes is usually unknown and poorly described by models focused on the analysis of onset mechanisms of rock slope failure and their topographic, lithological, structural, and climatic controls (Agliardi et al, ; Ambrosi & Crosta, ). Attempts to model different stages of long‐term alpine rock slope evolution must face several caveats , including (a) limitations of rheological approaches to the time‐dependent modeling of slope evolution, unless a landslide shear zone is predetermined (De Caro et al, ); (b) lack of knowledge regarding progressive evolution of fractures under nearly constant gravitational stress conditions; (c) almost unknown spatial and temporal water distribution in the slope during and after deglaciation (Crosta et al, ; McColl, ); (d) limited knowledge of the damage‐dependent evolution of rock mass permeability on the scale and stress conditions of rock slopes; and (e) limited understanding of hydromechanical controls on rockslide differentiation, as a major input to the development of rockslide forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%