2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/arso.2015.7428199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D laser based road obstacle classification for road safety improvement

Abstract: Vehicle and pedestrian collisions often result in fatality to the vulnerable road users (VRU), indicating a strong need of technologies to protect such persons. Laser sensors have been extensively used for moving obstacles detection and tracking. Laser impacts are produced by reflection on these obstacles which suggests that more information is available for their classification. This paper proposes a new system to address this issue. We introduce the design of our system that is divided in three parts : defin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another solution is similar to the approach widely used in computer vision by extracting hand-crafted features and training classifiers. Image-based object detection is very popular in current autonomous driving research, such as road obstacles detection [6], mobility aids [7] and vehicle detection [8]. However, the sparse point data from a 2D Li-DAR are usually insufficient for reliable object identification using this kind of method within a single scan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another solution is similar to the approach widely used in computer vision by extracting hand-crafted features and training classifiers. Image-based object detection is very popular in current autonomous driving research, such as road obstacles detection [6], mobility aids [7] and vehicle detection [8]. However, the sparse point data from a 2D Li-DAR are usually insufficient for reliable object identification using this kind of method within a single scan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As highlighted in [11] the adjacent property can be found false in the case of partial occlusion or objects with holes but for the current platoon application this limitation was found acceptable. The classification used is very simple but efficient and stable enough when used in conjunction with the tracking strategy that temporally refines classification as in [23].…”
Section: A Lidar Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merdrignac et al [18] also detect cars, bicyclists and static road obstacles in 2D range data. They hypothesize that more 6 https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02636v1 information can be extracted from range data than done before and aim to achieve this by designing a large set of hand-crafted features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While early detection methods used simple heuristics such as fitting lines and circles [35], in the past few years hand crafted features, coupled with learned classifiers, have dominated laser based detection. Within this paradigm, a range of successful people [1], [30], [20], mobility aid [34] and road obstacle [18] detectors have been developed to support mobile robot navigation [8] and autonomous driving [28]. Even though the aforementioned models obtain respectable results, the general consensus seems to be that the information provided by 2D range data is not sufficient to reliably perform detection in a single scan, leading to approaches relying on sensor fusion [30], multilayered sensor setups [20], [29], or temporal integration of information by tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%