The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/eusipco.2016.7760442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D direction of arrival estimation of multiple moving sources using a spherical microphone array

Abstract: Direction of arrival estimation using a spherical microphone array is an important and growing research area. One promising algorithm is the recently proposed Subspace PseudoIntensity Vector method. In this contribution the Subspace Pseudo-Intensity Vector method is combined with a state-ofthe-art method for robustly estimating the centres of mass in a 2D histogram based on matching pursuits. The performance of the improved Subspace Pseudo-Intensity Vector method is evaluated in the context of localising multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years, several approaches have been developed for the task of broadband DOA estimation. Some popular approaches are: i) subspace based approaches such as multiple signal classification (MUSIC) [1], [2], ii) time difference of arrival (TDOA) based approaches that use the family of generalized cross correlation (GCC) methods [3], [4], iii) generalizations of the cross-correlation methods such as steered response power with phase transform (SRP-PHAT) [5], and multichannel cross correlation coefficient (MCCC) [6], iv) adaptive multichannel time delay estimation using blind system identification based methods [7], v) probabilistic model based methods such as maximum likelihood method [8] and vi) methods based on histogram analysis of narrowband DOA estimates [9], [10]. These methods are generally formulated under the assumption of free-field propagation of sound waves, however in indoor acoustic environments this assumption is violated due to the presence of reverberation leading to severe degradation in their performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, several approaches have been developed for the task of broadband DOA estimation. Some popular approaches are: i) subspace based approaches such as multiple signal classification (MUSIC) [1], [2], ii) time difference of arrival (TDOA) based approaches that use the family of generalized cross correlation (GCC) methods [3], [4], iii) generalizations of the cross-correlation methods such as steered response power with phase transform (SRP-PHAT) [5], and multichannel cross correlation coefficient (MCCC) [6], iv) adaptive multichannel time delay estimation using blind system identification based methods [7], v) probabilistic model based methods such as maximum likelihood method [8] and vi) methods based on histogram analysis of narrowband DOA estimates [9], [10]. These methods are generally formulated under the assumption of free-field propagation of sound waves, however in indoor acoustic environments this assumption is violated due to the presence of reverberation leading to severe degradation in their performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigate the criteria under which smoothed histograms of PIVs and SSPIVs give accurate estimates of the DOAs of multiple sources in a noisy reverberant environment, including when sources are moving. Some of the first steps of an earlier version of the SSPIV method were presented in [13] and [29]. The current paper extends both the theoretical analysis and the evaluation of the PIV method compared to [8], especially in the context of multiple and moving speakers and in real-world applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The relative gain, 0 ≤ g ≤ 1, and phase, −π < γ ≤ π, of the second plane wave with the respect to the first give α 2 = gα 1 and β 2 = β 1 + γ. Therefore, from (29),…”
Section: Coherent Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In DPD 7 using SMAs, the covariance matrix is approximated as the average covariance matrix over a local TF region 7,12 R(τ, k)…”
Section: Msecmentioning
confidence: 99%