2018
DOI: 10.20965/jaciii.2018.p0369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D Direction Histogram-Based Rényi Entropic Multilevel Thresholding

Abstract: 2D histogram-based thresholding methods, in which the histogram is computed from local image features, have better performance than 1D histogram-based methods, but they take much more computation time. In this paper, we present a Rényi entropic multilevel thresholding (REMT) method based on a 2D direction histogram constructed from pixel values and local directional features. In addition to presenting a fast recursive method for REMT, we propose the Rényi entropic artificial bee colony multilevel thresholding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the proposed HEBT method has been assessed by comparing it with six other state‐of‐the‐art histogram–entropy‐based automatic threshold methods, where all the experiments have been implemented with the three‐frame differencing segmentation algorithm. The six state‐of‐the‐art methods studied are: a GLLFE histogram method [40], a grey‐level‐histogram and local‐entropy information method [41], Renyi's entropic multi‐level thresholding method based on a 2D histogram [43], a grey‐level and local‐average histogram along with Tsallis–Handra–Charvat entropy method [44], a new entropic thresholding method based on the 2D histogram constructed using a Gabor filter [45], and a generalised entropy‐based thresholding method based on Masi entropy [46]. The comparisons between the HEBT method and the other state‐of‐the‐art methods are made in terms of segmented images and performance parameters: average recall, average precision, average similarity, average f‐measure, and computation time.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The efficiency of the proposed HEBT method has been assessed by comparing it with six other state‐of‐the‐art histogram–entropy‐based automatic threshold methods, where all the experiments have been implemented with the three‐frame differencing segmentation algorithm. The six state‐of‐the‐art methods studied are: a GLLFE histogram method [40], a grey‐level‐histogram and local‐entropy information method [41], Renyi's entropic multi‐level thresholding method based on a 2D histogram [43], a grey‐level and local‐average histogram along with Tsallis–Handra–Charvat entropy method [44], a new entropic thresholding method based on the 2D histogram constructed using a Gabor filter [45], and a generalised entropy‐based thresholding method based on Masi entropy [46]. The comparisons between the HEBT method and the other state‐of‐the‐art methods are made in terms of segmented images and performance parameters: average recall, average precision, average similarity, average f‐measure, and computation time.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the parameters for the six state‐of‐the‐art methods clearly indicates among them that some of these methods show highest values only for one or two performance parameters (underlined entries). For example, the method by Yimit and Hagihara [43] shows the highest value only for recall (0.7689) and similarity (0.632). Similarly, the method by Borjigin and Sahoo [44] offers the highest value only for precision (0.7980) and the Yi et al method [45] possess the highest value only for f‐measure (0.6590).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations