2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D and 3D CT Radiomics Features Prognostic Performance Comparison in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare 2D and 3D radiomics features prognostic performance differences in CT images of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHOD: We enrolled 588 NSCLC patients from three independent cohorts. Two sets of 463 patients from two different institutes were used as the training cohort. The remaining cohort with 125 patients was set as the validation cohort. A total of 1014 radiomics features (507 2D features and 507 3D features correspondingly) were assessed. Based on the dichotomized survival data,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
81
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
81
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, 3D radiomic features were used to predict the LVI status. The 3D features provided more comprehensive information about lesions and improved the prediction accuracy of radiomics analysis compared with 2D features . Third, the reproducibility of radiomics features should be validated according to the radiomics‐based guideline .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, 3D radiomic features were used to predict the LVI status. The 3D features provided more comprehensive information about lesions and improved the prediction accuracy of radiomics analysis compared with 2D features . Third, the reproducibility of radiomics features should be validated according to the radiomics‐based guideline .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D features provided more comprehensive information about lesions and improved the prediction accuracy of radiomics analysis compared with 2D features. 41 Third, the reproducibility of radiomics features should be validated according to the radiomics-based guideline. 42 In our study, only the extracted features with an ICC >0.75 were eligible for LASSO logistic regression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous studies used automatic or semiautomatic segmentation methods because manual segmentation is time‐consuming and is susceptible to interobserver variability . Nonetheless, manual delineation of the tumors by experienced radiologist is standard clinical routine, which has been applied in many radiomics studies . Moreover, MRI has a better soft tissue resolution, allowing tumor borders to be delineated more accurately than CT or PET/CT .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12,35 Nonetheless, manual delineation of the tumors by experienced radiologist is standard clinical routine, which has been applied in many radiomics studies. 23,[36][37][38][39] Moreover, MRI has a better soft tissue resolution, allowing tumor borders to be delineated more accurately than CT or PET/CT. 25 Given that reason, we handcrafted all segmentations on tumors slice by slice and achieved satisfactory inter-and intra-observer reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether these image signs could be used for TFTY BCa recurrence prediction remains inconclusive to date. In addition, a preoperative radiomics strategy with nomogram models are reported to be capable of individualized recurrence risk stratification of patients with lung, hepatic, and gastric cancer diseases, as well as predicting mental disorders schizophrenia …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%