2018
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visit, consume and quit: Patch quality affects the three stages of foraging

Abstract: Foraging is a three-stage process during which animals visit patches, consume food and quit. Foraging theory exploring relative patch quality has mostly focused on patch use and quitting decisions, ignoring the first crucial step for any forager: finding food. Yet, the decision to visit a patch is just as important as the decision to quit, as quitting theories can only be used if animals visit patches in the first place. Therefore, to better understand the foraging process and predict its outcomes, it is neces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If such elevated water demand does exist when hot, our data suggest that provisioning adults might be unable to increase biomass provisioned in order meet this demand. This is because biomass caught declined with increasing temperature above 32.3ºC, indicating poorer foraging success (du Plessis et al 2012;Cunningham et al 2015;van de Ven et al 2019) and suggesting that there was probably less biomass available at high temperatures with which to provision to nestlings (Conrey et al 2016;Dodson et al 2016;Mella et al 2018). Adults may also be constrained in their ability to provision more water-rich food to nestlings at high temperatures due to the increased costs of flight at high air temperatures (Klaassen 1995;Powers et al 2017) and the need to attend to their own water demands (Bourne, Ridley, et al 2020;Czenze et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If such elevated water demand does exist when hot, our data suggest that provisioning adults might be unable to increase biomass provisioned in order meet this demand. This is because biomass caught declined with increasing temperature above 32.3ºC, indicating poorer foraging success (du Plessis et al 2012;Cunningham et al 2015;van de Ven et al 2019) and suggesting that there was probably less biomass available at high temperatures with which to provision to nestlings (Conrey et al 2016;Dodson et al 2016;Mella et al 2018). Adults may also be constrained in their ability to provision more water-rich food to nestlings at high temperatures due to the increased costs of flight at high air temperatures (Klaassen 1995;Powers et al 2017) and the need to attend to their own water demands (Bourne, Ridley, et al 2020;Czenze et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger foragers may indeed be able to maintain a relatively higher harvest rate by improving their collection behavior (Dukas and Kamil , Catania and Remple , Mella et al. ) and by learning (Ishii and Shimada ). Furthermore, the costs of thermoregulation per unit of mass of rodents decrease as size increases (Bozinovic and Rosenmann ), so that larger individuals are advantaged when foraging in extreme temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although movements that bring animals to a patch are important, foraging is not complete until food is found. Odour cues can guide animal movements from afar [28] and are likely essential in finding food at fine scales (centimetres to metres) too. Food plants for generalist herbivores often occur within metres of each other, and their odour cues could be harnessed for efficient, directed search even at this fine scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%